Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
xamdam
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
by
xamdam
2y ago
Because that's where countries go to die?
2.
▲
by
xamdam
4y ago
GPT cannot currently do this (for long documents), and you have a commonly requested use case. For now you can charge as much as they do and have a decent business I'm guessing, but future depends on LLMs from OpenAI and other getting
3.
▲
by
xamdam
4y ago
I'd pay for an API to this
4.
▲
by
xamdam
4y ago
Impressed with their long document summarization, any ideas how they do this? Seems beyond normal GPT limitations; either they have a more powerful model (doubt it) or hacked around the limitations? e.g. good summary for a very long text h
5.
▲
by
xamdam
4y ago
there's important professional mentoring which addresses people/org/mgmt problems, I suspect there might be other good resources on higher-level software eng skills (architecture, refactoring, code organization) - appreciate
6.
▲
by
xamdam
4y ago
I love apple products but I hate this stuff. They're cynically kneecapping competition and hurting consumer choice, like they're not rich enough already. Would class action be a to do thing here?
7.
▲
by
xamdam
4y ago
lisp
8.
▲
by
xamdam
5y ago
This is amazing and inspirational engineering. Can they scale this up to taking humans & large payloads to orbit? It seems hard to run this business sustainably on millionaire tourists, 4-minute science experiments and ads. Anyone have
9.
▲
by
xamdam
6y ago
Is it known to be particularly good?
10.
▲
by
xamdam
6y ago
Relevant post about GPT2: https://srconstantin.wordpress.com/2019/02/25/humans-who-are...
11.
▲
by
xamdam
7y ago
Curious what your source for "make the cut" is. I have my own interpretation, but would like to see the original.
12.
▲
by
xamdam
7y ago
Yeah, just noticed. Posted this (even earlier) on Reddit ML it didn't get as much interest
13.
▲
by
xamdam
7y ago
Oh-oh, no linkifying in text submissions, well here we go: OCW link: https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/18-065-matrix-method... YouTube playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLUl4u3c
14.
▲
Gilbert Strang's New Course on Linear Algebra+ for ML Now Online
161 points
by
xamdam
7y ago
|
23 comments
15.
▲
by
xamdam
10y ago
a) Not sure if MIRI is a spiritual parent of OpenAI. It's a different approach to the problem, and I'm not sure MIRI would spawn OpenAI if they had the resources. b) Also, unfair to MIRI. They are not only researching the area but
16.
▲
by
xamdam
11y ago
According to Schelling's model even slight preference to be with your own color leads to segregation http://nifty.stanford.edu/2014/mccown-schelling-model-segreg...
17.
▲
by
xamdam
11y ago
yes this is lame (but I understand 75TB is not ok). go tell @onedrive on twitter
18.
▲
by
xamdam
11y ago
Top words for Seinfeld are things you can't say on TV. Data broken?
19.
▲
by
xamdam
11y ago
ELI5: until we flew next to Pluto this month all we had is blurry 16-pixel images. How can we get such precise data on something millions of times further?
20.
▲
by
xamdam
11y ago
Interesting, but would this do any better than using real crime data, such as geolocated data police departments have already?
21.
▲
by
xamdam
11y ago
> Not even out of the gate and already reaching for an ad-hominem. You must be fun at parties. I think you misunderstood; I did not mean you're an average researcher - I have no idea - but unless you hang our with hotshots at AI
22.
▲
by
xamdam
11y ago
I would expect to get this kind of impression from an average researcher, because that's what average researchers do (even at AI conferences). What do the top researchers think? Google paid 10M per head for DeepMind guys, explicitly wo
23.
▲
by
xamdam
11y ago
Yes, absolutely there is a reason for concern. I now volunteer for FLI (the organization Musk funded; we deal with both AI and other x-risks, synthetic bio etc). From a somewhat insider view I think there is a lot we can do, and time might
24.
▲
by
xamdam
11y ago
The default outcomes are bad; Culture would be pretty great by comparison. Worst-case scenarios are not likely for the same reasons best ones aren't - the default is AI indifference (they use you for atoms) Since you mentioned worst, t
25.
▲
by
xamdam
11y ago
In the 1930s Ernest Rutherford (1871–1937) repeatedly suggested, sometimes angrily, that the possibility of harnessing atomic energy was "moonshine". The examples you mention are of things actually likely never achievable, while t
26.
▲
by
xamdam
11y ago
You're underestimating the field. The goal was always intelligence, and many leading researchers are pretty openly aiming for that. Stupid Mathematical Tricks are components of intelligence, and while it's true SVM with a cool new
27.
▲
by
xamdam
11y ago
I largely agree with you (have been supporting intelligence.org before the topic was cool) but I think if we don't achieve human-friendly AI it's on us; a real failure rather than just succumbing to circumstances (like getting blo
28.
▲
by
xamdam
12y ago
thanks for doing my job for me :)
29.
▲
by
xamdam
12y ago
- Highly doubt it's purely a money decision - Vapnik is joining a number of people he previously worked with - Getting huge computational resources and seeing your ideas applied to real data is rewarding
30.
▲
by
xamdam
12y ago
Love the idea - thought of it 7+ years ago! Hope you guys succeed.
More ›