wubbawibba

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by wubbawibba 2mo ago

   Yeah I know, patronizing random nobody. Way to go with the only option when the potential for inaccuracy is pointed out. "It might not be inaccurate!" Real big brain stuff wrapped in copy paste of philosophical twaddle. Not really
2. 2.▲
   by wubbawibba 2mo ago

   When faced with an information asymmetry (lack of knowledge of other posters) you engage in a kind of phrenology... taking a few sentences of others and filling in huge gaps in your knowledge with biases that you cannot confirm are true and
3. 3.▲
   by wubbawibba 2mo ago

   If you're so sure you're ignorant of those topics why so sure those measures are meaningful? Why answer what may just be some words you know but irrelevant to the context? Can you prove the so-called experts know better? Or are yo