wspaniel

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by wspaniel 12y ago

   That's when you use Bayesian Nash equilibrium or perfect Bayesian equilibrium. No big deal.
2. 2.▲
   by wspaniel 12y ago

   You could show the same thing by relaxing those assumptions. It would just require a lot more algebra. The key insight is that, holding everything else constant (which is done in the lecture), weakening your accuracy to one side increases t
3. 3.▲
   Game Theory Is Counterintuitive(wjspaniel.wordpress.com)

   49 points by wspaniel 12y ago|23 comments
4. 4.▲
   by wspaniel 15y ago

   Game theory doesn't become computationally intensive until you reach mixed strategies, which start about half way through the first chapter. (If this comment is referring to the PDF preview on my website, the PDF only contains the first les
5. 5.▲
   by wspaniel 15y ago

   When I started making the videos back in 2009, my concern was just showing how to solve games. Details were details, especially since your average YouTube viewer does not have much an attention spam that lasts past five minutes. But you're