written

7 ms·

1.
by written 8y ago
Hmm, I never thought my informative post would get flagged, while baseless speculation is upvoted. The parent is pretty much 9/11 inside job conspiracy level stuff. I just stated a few facts about what happened, and how that contradict
2.
by written 8y ago
Most of the big providers are shit, I wish I could shame them, but alas, I can not. If I'm responding to e-mail from their users, I expect at least my initial response will get through. You really don't need any fancy crap like DK
3.
by written 8y ago
Have you looked around? :)
4.
by written 8y ago
They will get there on weekend. OPCW was allowed in. Unless the strikes will change that.
5.
by written 8y ago
Probably too early for anyone to have any substantial comments anyway.
6.
by written 8y ago
All I hope is that the regime didn't do the same shitty thing it did in anticipation of Obama's response in 2013, when they moved prisoners into evacuated air bases, in hopes that the US will kill them.
7.
by written 8y ago
Just take the info with a grain of salt. Counterattack on whom? US forces in the east? US/French ships in the west?
8.
by written 8y ago
Thank you Bulgaria. Hopefully the real thing without thickeners will always be available. A lot of crap is being sold as yogurt by the usual multinational culprits. I guess we can make it at home if need be.
9.
by written 8y ago
Oh, I understood that posting the photo was propaganda, not the actual content of the notes. I guess the meaning of the parent post was ambiguous.
10.
by written 8y ago
Everyone's repeating the 73% number, like it's some shocking statistic. It's meaningless number in isolation. For example if backpage.com captured 70% of the sex ads market, I'd expect it to also capture the sex ads rela
11.
by written 8y ago
Perhaps a breach of privacy, but propaganda?
12.
by written 8y ago
Just make the algorithm select a random frame, and it will be solved.
13.
by written 8y ago
x264 is a software codec.
14.
by written 8y ago
That's probably why he seems to enjoy it so much.
15.
by written 8y ago
Even random clicking on these "select X" captchas works. You'll just get a longer run around, until AI gets bored and lets you in. Perhaps it recognizes that being annoyed and a willful breaking of rules are also human qualit
16.
by written 8y ago
I just realized I'm obfuscating my internet usage inadverently. Here's how: Good source of reasonable randomness is twitter. I've set up a scrapper for various twitter accounts and I'm downloading every page that is link
17.
by written 8y ago
That's pretty good. It would require some serious gullibility to defeat. If it's active attack, attacker may send the second mail with the passcode and instruct the user to enter it. Though people are forwarding their second facto
18.
by written 8y ago
Many state run organizations have to be compliant too.
19.
by written 8y ago
Also user can require the service to remove his personal information and that means that service provider has to notify services he uses to stop using and remove that PI. How will this work with Google Analytics and things like that? Will r
20.
by written 8y ago
You have no guarantee that the domain part case is preserved from what the user wrote, if it's not defined to be case-sensitive. So you can do what you want, but the input data are not reliable.
21.
by written 8y ago
Depends on the service. I've seen verification e-mails that just contain a link with no other text. Or with texts like "Continue here: [link]".
22.
by written 8y ago
You don't click because you're educated in these matters. Most people are not.
23.
by written 8y ago
It's a user's problem. If user is willing to click through some unsolicited email and pay , he will probably click on the verification link too if the service would send those. It's still a statistics game. Not everyone woul
24.
by written 8y ago
Not true, domain part is case insensitive by the standard. Server can decide for non-standard behavior, but that would be foolish.
25.
by written 8y ago
I hoped it was not.
26.
by written 8y ago
Sounds too cheap, are you sure it's not a fake?
27.
by written 8y ago
It works surprisingly well and it makes many operations faster than ext4. I noticed it especially when doing system updates. And I've just read yesterday, that F2FS in Linux 4.17 will have further optimizations for low end systems. Yay
28.
by written 8y ago
Google doesn't need to break encryption for other reasons too. It has JavaScript execution access and thus access to all the client side data on at least the half of the top 1mil. websites on the internet. It's easily blockable fo
29.
by written 8y ago
I have similar experience with SanDisk and Samsung EVO+. 9 Pi's (not raspberry) running continuously for ~2 years. No kernel panics/PostgreSQL failures. I run with data checksuming enabled. I also disabled options in PostgreSQL th
30.
by written 8y ago
Host side interface limitation.

More ›