wotamess

25 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by wotamess 27d ago

   "want to ingest" Not "need to ingest" Copyright holders are capitalizing on laws on the books just like Jeff Bezos companies buying their own copies to shred So in the end it's really a Congress problem as usual
2. 2.▲
   by wotamess 27d ago

   Eventually we'll compress out unnecessary state and keep desired data states only; AI then won't be editing k8s yml, source code, etc. It will just be computing new geometric states and syncing them to the screen. Incidentally not
3. 3.▲
   by wotamess 27d ago

   I didn't "just" discover such a generalization at all; well aware entropy erodes state. I "just" compared prior experience and current experience specifically.
4. 4.▲
   by wotamess 27d ago

   Does it matter? The set of possible and desirable non-copyrighted text/audio/visual states to render is effectively infinite. Laws don't prevent Scrabble clones; tropes are not protected. Endless remixes of public domain cont
5. 5.▲
   by wotamess 27d ago

   Everyone turning into Metallica. The whole "copyright infringement is theft" meme seems to have stuck. 20 years ago it was all "information wants to be free" and "infringement is not theft; being deprived of specula
6. 6.▲
   by wotamess 27d ago

   This misunderstands the "hard problem" of consciousness which for brevity's sake I will just pose as the question "why does the universe exist at all?" Sure, we don't know that answer. Probably cannot without a