Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
wolfman1
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
Show HN: Oversold.com – Analyze a stock in 30 seconds
(oversold.com)
3 points
by
wolfman1
2d ago
|
0 comments
2.
▲
Show HN: Pre-computed market context for agents
(tickerdb.com)
2 points
by
wolfman1
4mo ago
|
0 comments
3.
▲
by
wolfman1
5mo ago
Sorry for the confusion. The data updates at America/New_York (Eastern time, EST/EDT)
4.
▲
by
wolfman1
5mo ago
The data updates at America/New_York (Eastern time, EST/EDT)
5.
▲
by
wolfman1
5mo ago
Data is updated daily (midnight EST) for all 10,000+ assets. EOD data. No real-time support. We cache data in cloudflare.
6.
▲
Show HN: TickerDB – pre-computed market context for agents
(tickerdb.com)
1 points
by
wolfman1
5mo ago
|
6 comments
7.
▲
by
wolfman1
1y ago
Care sharing how you came to that conclusion? We've been completely transparent about everything we've built since the start. And our trades are transparent as well.
8.
▲
by
wolfman1
1y ago
Thanks! My claim is that The Technical Trades (TTT) was the only service that worked for me. I stand by that. And I have no affiliation with TTT. Beyond that, please contact Chris if you want more detailed proof of their track record.
9.
▲
by
wolfman1
1y ago
Agreed
10.
▲
by
wolfman1
1y ago
There must have been a misunderstanding. They've been around since 2008 and appear to have beaten SPX yearly since then. I'm sure he has thousands of people that will vouch for him. Ask around on Reddit, etc. if you're curiou
11.
▲
by
wolfman1
1y ago
Btw I think your YT channel would be a good idea.
12.
▲
by
wolfman1
1y ago
Anything that is related to HFT or day trading is almost impossible in my experience as well. The big funds can do it but I dont think retail has a chance with these approaches. Have you researched trend or stage analysis? They're slow
13.
▲
by
wolfman1
1y ago
The fees are no joke
14.
▲
by
wolfman1
1y ago
What about Hedge funds?
15.
▲
by
wolfman1
1y ago
I'm realizing there's a lot of confusion about what trend based models actually are. I was under the assumption the concept was more widely understood, but I'm realizing we need to explain it better. To be clear, there's
16.
▲
by
wolfman1
1y ago
They're the real deal means they're not a scam. I don't know everything about their business. I recommend just looking at their website. They've been in business for nearly 20y and have consistently outperformed buy &
17.
▲
by
wolfman1
1y ago
Not sure, but I personally used their service for 2y and they're the real deal. Looks like they've been around since 2008. So almost 20y now. The main guy that runs it (Chris V) is top notch. I'm not affiliate with them in an
18.
▲
by
wolfman1
1y ago
Overcrowding an entry on highly liquid assets is something that is so far from reality for our service.
19.
▲
by
wolfman1
1y ago
This is typically true for day trading signal services. I'm very skeptical of them too. I've tried many of them and none worked for me. There are a lot of scams. The best model I tried was from The Technical Traders. They offer a
20.
▲
by
wolfman1
1y ago
That's a fair concern. Because TrendFi is a trend based model, the signals are not for HFT or day trading. Instead, we identify major market shifts that play out over weeks or months. This long timeframe means the signals are less vuln
21.
▲
by
wolfman1
1y ago
Most trading signals aim to exploit a secret edge. A temporary market inefficiency. The value is in the secret itself. Once you sell the secret, the small window of opportunity is competed away almost instantly. Trend based models are diffe
22.
▲
Show HN: TrendFi – I built AI trading signals that self-optimize
(trend.fi)
35 points
by
wolfman1
1y ago
|
52 comments
23.
▲
by
wolfman1
1y ago
Yes, should be fine on our end. Probably not a good idea to include us on anything that requires NDAs, etc. Since that data will be fed into Gemini. EDIT: I can't speak for your company. You should check company policies before includ
24.
▲
by
wolfman1
1y ago
I was surprised to see no one built it yet
25.
▲
by
wolfman1
1y ago
Agreed. At the very least, it solves the context switching problem between email and chat AI.
26.
▲
by
wolfman1
1y ago
Yeah, probably. Or they just buy our startup if it has traction already.
27.
▲
by
wolfman1
1y ago
Agreed, definitely some pros to using LLMs in email vs chat. Feels pretty natural to send an email and get a response shortly after with a notification, etc.
28.
▲
by
wolfman1
1y ago
Fair points. We have the ability to restrict any address, so shouldn't be much of a concern on our end to shut down ceo@, etc. We dont use any data for our own training. We send it to Gemini to process the prompt and encrypt it at rest
29.
▲
by
wolfman1
1y ago
We encrypt data at rest, but obviously we need to send it to a LLM for processing. We make this clear in our privacy policy fwiw.
30.
▲
by
wolfman1
1y ago
Yes you can pretty much do anything. CC, FWD, include humans or many AIs on the email too.
More ›