wobblyasp

6 ms·

1.
by wobblyasp 2mo ago
Some things feel impossible until they happen.
2.
by wobblyasp 6mo ago
Dunno. You'll have to ask him. https://www.war.gov/News/Transcripts/Transcript/Article/4418...
3.
by wobblyasp 6mo ago
The DoD has vocally stated their intent to maximize death. They have explicit stated their disgust for the rules of engagement.
4.
by wobblyasp 7mo ago
Y c a. E b c c ky
5.
by wobblyasp 8mo ago
Tu Quoque AND false equivalency. Impressive. We should all care how resources are used, even if don't own them. That investment is going to make things more expensive for everyone. See RAM, SSD, and GPU prices.
6.
by wobblyasp 8mo ago
Probably less about direct enforcement, more about after the fact. Ebay doesn't want to deal with charge backs for hallucinate purchases
7.
by wobblyasp 1y ago
Verifying behavior is great and all if you can actually exhaustively test the behaviors of your system. If you can't, then not knowing what your code is actually doing is going to set you back when things do go belly up.
8.
by wobblyasp 1y ago
What an amazing place to run a business. Absolutely no one is seriously clamoring for the old team name. It's an issue that DFM. But of course, because it's on the agenda of the day we need to drop everything. This is no better th
9.
by wobblyasp 1y ago
I find it laughable we still make statements like "blurred lines". This is 100% crony capitalism. Any suggestion to the contrary is naive at best and intentionally ambigious at worst.
10.
by wobblyasp 1y ago
We call it spoon bread in the east. True spoon bread is baked in an old tin can. Not sweet.
11.
by wobblyasp 1y ago
Darts an old one. At least since my parents age.
12.
by wobblyasp 1y ago
I think the only thing that's going to change is expectation around deliverables. I don't need an L4 to crack out some dirty code now, I'll let an agent do it so the L4 can level their skills up grinding harder problems.
13.
by wobblyasp 1y ago
Yah I'm not really getting why that was chosen. Maybe not 100%, but something closer to 75% would be totally workable
14.
by wobblyasp 1y ago
I'm so fucking tired of people who had no interest in software development telling me software development is dead. The author repeatedly states they have little knowledge of the tech they're using. But they're CERTAIN in wha
15.
by wobblyasp 1y ago
What did it break for you? It was a relatively straightforwardly renaming process.
16.
by wobblyasp 1y ago
If they actually had something like that they'd stop talking about it and release it. Until we play with it, it doesn't exist.
17.
by wobblyasp 1y ago
So do you avoid going outside to reduce exposure to environmental pollutants? Water fluoridation is a net-benefit to society.
18.
by wobblyasp 2y ago
They aggregate polls. They weren't involved with polling
19.
by wobblyasp 2y ago
If he wasn't actively villifying these people to his base. This is just calling a spade a spade
20.
by wobblyasp 2y ago
Flagged before I submitted the second. Happy for this post to get recycled, I just want to ensure that HN has a chance to discuss it.
21.
by wobblyasp 2y ago
Flagged again :-(
22.
by wobblyasp 2y ago
Say what you will about the cuts, you can't have people with zero clearance being given access to all of this data.
23.
by wobblyasp 2y ago
Looks like the original is flapping between flagged/unflagged. Topic is serious enough to warrant discussion.
24.
by wobblyasp 2y ago
Again; made no comment about what people do day to day. Specifically commenting on the authors praise of the LLM doing "novel" work.
25.
by wobblyasp 2y ago
I sincerely doubt it; but I also work in an Org that has highly internal code with none to poor documentation. Also, I never said it was a "downside". I'm simply stating that the author is exaggerating what the LLM is doing.
26.
by wobblyasp 2y ago
What are you "learning"? "Prompt engineering" is hardly a skill and varies LLM to LLM.
27.
by wobblyasp 2y ago
> This wasn't something that existed, it wasn't regurgitating knowledge from Stackoverflow. It was inventing/creating something new. Except it was. It wasn't regurgitating the exact answer it gave you, but it was usin
28.
by wobblyasp 2y ago
I'm confused. Assistants are so easy to use yet we should drop everything to "learn"/"adopt" them? Why not just wait until they're not complete dumpster fires then start using them?
29.
by wobblyasp 2y ago
> Reed Hastings' decision to pivot Netflix into original content production is a great example ... based on years of experience in entertainment and technology Is it? How do you show that? Was he just lucky? Did he divine the right
30.
by wobblyasp 2y ago
It's not, but maybe I don't want to create a file for the tests. The point theyre trying to make is that it's a personal preference and not an obvious "this way is better"

More ›