winniewinnie

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by winniewinnie 13d ago

   By "implicit ordering", do you mean "implicitly assumed that the data is ordered a certain way"? Since if that assumption of data being sorted a certain way is broken on some systems and not others, the result might be b
2. 2.▲
   by winniewinnie 13d ago

   Wouldn't such people just pass in maintain_order=False ?
3. 3.▲
   by winniewinnie 13d ago

   Have Polars' inconsistent versioning policy caused you any problems?
4. 4.▲
   by winniewinnie 13d ago

   But Polars does: https://docs.pola.rs/development/versioning/ > Polars adheres to the semantic versioning specification: And it does have breaking changes in 2.0. The original asker presumably missed that. E: O
5. 5.▲
   by winniewinnie 13d ago

   Perhaps to get better results on benchmarks.