win311fwg

19 ms·

1.
by win311fwg 3d ago
Just remove anything software-related from the training dataset. Which also solves the alignment problem with those who do not enjoy seeing LLMs write software. But that brings us back to: Aligned to whom?
2.
by win311fwg 5d ago
> Correction: OpenAI carried out an attack on RubyGems. Your 'correction' is incorrect. A corporation did not carry out an attack. Humans did. And, as it happens, those humans were acting as agents to OpenAI, so the original
3.
by win311fwg 5d ago
Does the anthropomorphizing lead us down the wrong path? No. If it were you or I who set the same agents free we'd be burned at the stake. The anthropomorphizing has no effect. Does OpenAI being considered "too big to fail" l
4.
by win311fwg 5d ago
> It misdirects you away from who built the mower and aimed it. What gives you that idea? Maybe it is true temporarily, but blame always gets extended to all parties considered related in the end. For example, if it were instead a chil
5.
by win311fwg 5d ago
> You have repeatedly confused yourself by assigning your own meanings to my words As instructed, the words were taken literally. Now that you are telling us that we actually needed to read between the lines to understand what you real
6.
by win311fwg 5d ago
To be fair your dietician/healthcare professional might also be disappointed, but you're ultimately right, just like with college nobody else cares. Of course, that was already implied from the onset. I find it intriguing that you
7.
by win311fwg 5d ago
That doesn't make sense. If you want to take the food angle then the other serves homework. If you want to take the fraud angle then the other facilitates dietary fraud.
8.
by win311fwg 5d ago
That's just the cost of utilizing the dating service known as college. Being able to spend recklessly and manage other people to do one's busywork is what appeals within that dating market. Nobody wants to date a broke loser, so t
9.
by win311fwg 5d ago
Or even own a car, which is what most people do. The problem is already solved. But with any solution comes those who think they can do it better (who, when given the chance to try their alternative, in most cases only end up learning why t
10.
by win311fwg 5d ago
> But they are knowingly helping people cheat, right? In the same way a mom and pop pizza joint willingly serving someone who is trying to be on a strict healthy diet is helping people cheat, yes, but if McDonalds then rolled in and to
11.
by win311fwg 5d ago
> Banks are subject to much stricter regulation than any tech company is That's true, but remember what we're talking about: Using banks (or another trusted third-party) to assert your age instead of having big tech collectin
12.
by win311fwg 5d ago
The confusion is in the story changing each time. At one point you earlier asked us to take the literal text of the words, but in that text there is no literal mention of one company. It also literally asserts that you are currently frustra
13.
by win311fwg 5d ago
The message was directed at the employees. Their work may slow down, but that doesn't imply that all work will slow down. OpenAI also has this technology that purportedly can do the work without employees. In fact, if the employee wo
14.
by win311fwg 5d ago
If I had a bank, I'd trust it too, it being mine. Most people don't have the luxury, though. In practice, they have to outsource banking to other people. And those other people are already quite likely to move around between both
15.
by win311fwg 5d ago
No need to guess new meanings. The message was loud and clear: '"What problem are we trying to solve?" is a question I have to ask constantly in corporate development environments, and rarely does anyone presenting the task t
16.
by win311fwg 5d ago
Well, how do you expect a website to know that you are 18+? The technical solution offered earlier was to have a trusted third-party only be willing to answer the "is this person 18+?" question. Of course, the same works for banks
17.
by win311fwg 5d ago
> Banks by law require substantial PII in order to even do business with you. That is technically true, but keep in mind that in the early days of banking banks expected you to provide that information without the hand of the law requi
18.
by win311fwg 5d ago
> You (somewhat) trust your bank For what reason? > Since you know, they have your money. You may trust them with your money, but does not equate to trusting them with anything else. Principle of least privilege, if you will. Anth
19.
by win311fwg 5d ago
> Perhaps they can make their ideas reality by learning the fundamentals required to do these things. Unviable. Learning how to create the universe is provably an insurmountable challenge for the vast majority of people. They require h
20.
by win311fwg 5d ago
> from a trusted party like a bank. For what reason should I trust a bank?
21.
by win311fwg 5d ago
I has only been approximately 11 hours since your job was expressed to be quite different. I am glad that you recognized the source of your frustration and managed to turn your situation around — and so quickly at that! — but be aware that
22.
by win311fwg 6d ago
That’s the job we all want to have, but it doesn’t exist. It’d be nice to say you are the lone outlier here but unless the previous comment was completely made up we know that’s not the case.
23.
by win311fwg 6d ago
> It's why only software like [...] web browsers gets to be really good. Huh? Web browsers are still laughably bad even after all these years. They are engineering marvels, certainly, but using them leaves a lot to be desired. I c
24.
by win311fwg 6d ago
Reverse engineering the problem from someone's solution is the job. If you find it to be frustrating, you might be in the wrong profession.
25.
by win311fwg 6d ago
Exactly.
26.
by win311fwg 6d ago
> NY to LA would be about 11 hours at 250 MPH. There are no trains in regular service that operate at anywhere close to those speeds. There are trains technically capable of doing it (and much more), sure, but the economics quickly sto
27.
by win311fwg 6d ago
> Transit works much better in the Netherlands and much of Europe because those homes and job centres are not as evenly spaced as they are in most American cities since they developed more around public transport existing. Much more th
28.
by win311fwg 7d ago
Technically a large landmass, but essentially nothing happens in the western half. For the sake of travel it is a relatively small country. Whereas NY->LA is the route the USA would need to most service if it were to get serious about su
29.
by win311fwg 7d ago
Not really. Over short-to-medium distances rail and air have similar door-to-door times, but as a country grows vast and travel is much more likely to happen over long distances then rail is much less compelling. Which means smaller ridersh
30.
by win311fwg 7d ago
Trouble is, when you need to get to the middle of nowhere is when you need transportation. If you stay within the densely populated areas where the people live you can walk. That's why people stopped living in rural areas after all; so

More ›