willstraf

4 ms·

1.
by willstraf 15y ago
> 2.3 Apps that do not perform as advertised by the developer will be rejected > 2.11 Apps that duplicate apps already in the App Store may be rejected, particularly if there are many of them, such as fart, burp, flashlight, and Kam
2.
by willstraf 16y ago
> "It's pretty clear that nazism, racism, gaycism and other hateful applications shouldn't be allowed on the Apple App Store." Yes, exactly. I'm not sure if that above statement was an attempt at sarcasm, but it's completely true, they
3.
by willstraf 16y ago
> "it doesn't make any business sense to enter a PR war over the relatively miniscule amount of profit they'd make from this app." unless I'm mistaken, it was a free app (with no ads), so they made no money off of it.
4.
by willstraf 16y ago
Everyone here is missing the point, this is not exactly meant for direct ports of iOS applications to Mac OS X. For example, look at Twitter for Mac and Twitterific in the Mac App Store, they aren't direct / touch-based ports, but rather, t
5.
by willstraf 16y ago
I agree that the whole "try before you buy" thing seems like bullshit, but let me confirm. The "new rule" I posted about above is referring to a case in which the application is a paid application that is cracked, but the application detect
6.
by willstraf 16y ago
It's interesting you mention that. I pointed that out today, and a new rule was implemented, saying that if a cracked application has a built in (fully featured) timed trial when it detects that it is a pirated version, then that check shou
7.
by willstraf 16y ago
I hear this argument a lot, and wonder, is there any actual evidence out there to back it up/
8.
by willstraf 16y ago
It may seem that way to you, but just look at how popular Foursquare is. The general public loves it.