willseth

6 ms·

1.
by willseth 15d ago
> each UI element or portion of back-end having a separate dev team Really takes shipping your org chart to another level
2.
by willseth 21d ago
At Google's size, they're not required to disclose acquisition prices well into the hundreds of millions
3.
by willseth 1mo ago
$3.9 billion is not an acquihire!
4.
by willseth 9mo ago
Read more carefully
5.
by willseth 9mo ago
It literally doesn’t matter unless it impacts users. I don’t know why you would waste time on non problems.
6.
by willseth 9mo ago
You gauge with metrics and profiles, if necessary, and address as needed. You don’t scrutinize every line of code over whether it’s “reasonable” in advance instead of doing things that actually move the needle.
7.
by willseth 9mo ago
Sorry, you’re not allowed to discourage premature optimization or defend Python here.
8.
by willseth 9mo ago
Then you should have written that. Instead you have given more fodder for the premature optimization crowd.
9.
by willseth 9mo ago
Good callout on the paper reference, but this author gives gives every indication that he’s dead serious in the first paragraph. I don’t think commenters are confused.
10.
by willseth 9mo ago
Knowing that an empty string is 41 bytes or how many ns it takes to do arithmetic operations is not general knowledge.
11.
by willseth 9mo ago
Sometimes it’s as simple as finding the hotspot with a profiler and making a simple change to an algorithm or data structure, just like you would do in any language. The amount of handwringing people do about building systems with Python is
12.
by willseth 9mo ago
Every Python programmer should be thinking about far more important things than low level performance minutiae. Great reference but practically irrelevant except in rare cases where optimization is warranted. If your workload grows to the p
13.
by willseth 9mo ago
It doesn’t. You’re welcome to do your own research to confirm
14.
by willseth 9mo ago
“We didn’t have the expertise to build the thing we were building, got in way over our heads, and built a basic POC using legacy technology, which is fine.”
15.
by willseth 9mo ago
On a trumpet? A clarinet? No, the motions don't simultaneously overlap. The fingering mechanics are slightly different at speed, but you would still start slow while using the higher speed mechanics and tonguing technique, not jump int
16.
by willseth 9mo ago
Depends on the instrument. For wind instruments, the motions basically don’t change, and your focus is on synchronizing your mouth with your hands. Tonguing technique is different at high speed but you would typically practice with the same
17.
by willseth 10mo ago
What’s wrong with Matter?
18.
by willseth 11mo ago
"[Y]ou're welcome to fork Chromium or Firefox" is the software developer equivalent of saying "you're welcome to go fuck yourself."
19.
by willseth 11mo ago
It's true that there are security issues, but it's also true that they don't want to put any resources into making their XSLT implementation secure. There is strong unstated subtext that a huge motivation is that they simply
20.
by willseth 11mo ago
The lead dev driving the Chrome deprecation built a wasm polyfill https://github.com/mfreed7/xslt_polyfill . Multiple people proposed in the Github discussions leading up to this that Google simply make the polyfill shi
21.
by willseth 11mo ago
This is staff, principal, or even EM scope at many orgs. I have never seen anyone with a senior dev title directly managing juniors.
22.
by willseth 11mo ago
Maybe you were just bad at management and didn’t know it.
23.
by willseth 1y ago
You were supporting the tail end of an era that is universally agreed upon as an ecosystem failure. The internet didn't provide a consistent user experience for developers or for users, it generated mountains of legacy baggage, and it
24.
by willseth 1y ago
Ideally, sure, but that would increase the already enormous burden of building a standards compliant web browser. For a healthy web ecosystem it's important that not only trillion dollar companies can contribute or compete.
25.
by willseth 1y ago
I think the main reason you see overwhelming support for anchors is that the existing Actions functionality is typically so cumbersome to implement and often makes it harder to understand a workflow. Anchor syntax is a little esoteric, but
26.
by willseth 1y ago
YAML anchors may be a sharp tool but no one is forced to use them. I have written many verbose Github workflows that would have benefited from using anchors, and I am relieved to learn I can clean those up now.
27.
by willseth 1y ago
Our vet told us it is far more important that house cats get exercise than any potential frustration caused by a laser pointer.
28.
by willseth 1y ago
AWDL isn’t FindMy. It’s mostly for Airdrop and also uses Bluetooth for the initial connection then switches to WiFi for high bandwidth data.
29.
by willseth 1y ago
I’m not sure it would since the whole Bluetooth stack is already designed for P2P. Apple’s network is a true mesh though and not point to point. If you share locations with your friends on FindMy using iPhones or AirTags you will get update
30.
by willseth 1y ago
The FindMy network is already doing this at scale with location data. Offline messaging might be too niche of a use case for Apple but surely they’ve considered it.

More ›