wiei

7 ms·

1.
by wiei 6d ago
Nah not 0%. But firms will start paying attention and the likelihood is we will see revenue's stagnate (not growing as fast) in short order as a result of it. When people start having to be careful over a lot of stuff, they'll dec
2.
by wiei 6d ago
Was it? They've been dishing out cheap access specifically to researchers give over lmao. The researcher's got lured in - they need to accept they got played TBH. Altman is certainly more devious than Amodei - he's shown that
3.
by wiei 6d ago
Agents are the wrong paradigm entirely and have limited places where they actually belong. Going off and searching the web isn't really it. You need to create 'new worlds' where they can operate best - and even then constrain
4.
by wiei 6d ago
No its happening whilst the human is working with it. The new inputs provided become part of the brute-force. This is what Scam Altman means by 'self-recursive'. Trust me I've seen it happen to myself. I no longer trust ChatG
5.
by wiei 6d ago
COrrect and this is how labour displacement happens. There are many actions being performed today that can be nicely packaged. Im already working on such a project.
6.
by wiei 7d ago
Yes open source code was the first - it’s what has got Anthropic and OAI its revenues from selling outputs associated with producing code.
7.
by wiei 7d ago
I’d argue the invitation of researchers was incredibly strategic. Sam Altman knows what he’s doing. He will happily screw these folks to one-up his competition.
8.
by wiei 7d ago
That’s one perspective. I just view it as a thing that can brute force and produce outputs - that it has no way of ‘knowing’ - but doesn’t need to since it’s just running off of probability. No human can compete in that contest. But no llm