wickedlogic

8 ms·

1.
by wickedlogic 2mo ago
All this unrestricted network access is a bit wild to watch and hear, it is the part of the story that makes no sense to me. Someone is providing dns resolution, something is making and opening network sockets... even if it is clever enough
2.
by wickedlogic 5y ago
"Price on Application (also available after subscribed to the Trial for self-service customers)" Please dont do this... I even clicked on the follow through link, then you want me to sso... still no price. Save us all some time, i
3.
by wickedlogic 6y ago
For those interested, these videos are worthwhile to listen to: https://www.youtube.com/user/wholesystems Maybe starting with: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ab463aw0AWM
4.
by wickedlogic 7y ago
Bots are going to be the way we interact with the web (and really all systems) heading forward, this 'real people' at just 'browsers' is quite a misunderstanding of what a 'user-agent' really means in this day
5.
by wickedlogic 7y ago
Is it though? As long the person running the browser understands the tradeoffs? I mean, the browser is supposed to be your user-agent after all. To render and provide interactions as you deem fit...
6.
by wickedlogic 8y ago
https://coingeek.com/us-attorney-wants-ross-ulbrichts-murder... "hand-waive" seems inaccurate here, a lot of Ross's supporters flat out disagree with these charges in particular.
7.
by wickedlogic 8y ago
Deletion (or confirmed re-deletion) of the data is irrelevant at this point, it is the models created from that data, and their use, which will now persist in usefulness to Analytica. Armed with these models, and future refined/iterate
8.
by wickedlogic 9y ago
I haven't seen this reasonably addressed in any of the discussions, or org-based-presentations thus far. GDPR compliance itself basically ensures you cannot collect enough information to even defend against this type of attack vector.
9.
by wickedlogic 9y ago
See the details in my comment. The same way you would require authentication and/or signing on any request, on any modern platform. Not doing this is poor form.
10.
by wickedlogic 9y ago
If you are utilizing json-rpc anywhere in your stack, you should be authenticating every request via your transport(s), or the payload itself with JWT (or the like). To not do this, is to trust the world. This is true over http and browsers
11.
by wickedlogic 9y ago
How well does this fair over several frames?
12.
by wickedlogic 9y ago
Haven't we well established that water was used? ;) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dup19cX6yXo
13.
by wickedlogic 9y ago
Except the network actually forked, and both half's still exist (ETH and ETC) and both are still used. Really, it should not viewed 'a way'. The fun part will be when half the world forks bitcoin, but forcefully takes over th
14.
by wickedlogic 9y ago
Every morning at breakfast. Maybe other places during the day.
15.
by wickedlogic 9y ago
Must be fun to do testing for api failure modes with this...
16.
by wickedlogic 9y ago
I suspect they have some fixing to do yet... common prices listed on indexes are ~$3,539.82 USD at the moment. Coinbase UI has the UI pegged at $8,499.03 .. with console errors, and ssl to be distrusted errors.
17.
by wickedlogic 9y ago
Warn? Isn't this expected....
18.
by wickedlogic 9y ago
Bitcoins value does have an upper limit, to the extent it is cheaper/advantageous to move to a nearly identical clone, because the mainline is over-valued enough that the idea entices critical mass (of new people) to shift. This normal
19.
by wickedlogic 9y ago
So very much this. Particularly if you dont have enough context to be personalized, pre-compiled popular segments are a reasonable approach.
20.
by wickedlogic 9y ago
These pieces are starting to get pretty funny. `If it keeps growing, it'll be so expensive, it can't possibly work.` Also assumes bitcoin as we know it today is fully immutable, but that isn't the case, and neither is energy
21.
by wickedlogic 9y ago
The good news, it more popular now than before... sigh. https://hn.algolia.com/?query=Auto%20Complete%20with%20Redis...
22.
by wickedlogic 9y ago
My comment still stands. Likely? they could have fixed their infringing acts. Trademark infringement is not what took down this service (or so motivated these people to take down the service). I have yet to read an "IP" compliance
23.
by wickedlogic 9y ago
We should start by not calling it intellectual property (IP). Clearly this is not servicemark, trademark, etc. Is copyright actually preventing this?
24.
by wickedlogic 9y ago
The objections in the comments around this are somewhat funny. There is more than a small city's worth of electricity in whole system waste alone. It is like complaining that you didn't eat all of your bell pepper, when behind you
25.
by wickedlogic 9y ago
The point you are missing about these loopholes , is that broader strategies are mostly indistinguishable from "legitimate" usage of the same strategy. Wealth allows people to take more risk, and will/can do so... even at th
26.
by wickedlogic 9y ago
User machine, not blockchain, security will continue to be the biggest risk in all these systems. With gold for example, stealing the physical assets takes effort, resources, time, equipment, etc. With digital assets, that is not the case..
27.
by wickedlogic 9y ago
Something that struck me, is the wording is surprisingly unwordy for a cloud provider... - "based on the instance rental fee" - "Tell us what you think about this page and win $10 credit! " - "Instance Fee, Storage
28.
by wickedlogic 9y ago
Time to build out those mesh networks, make sure you are in the loop when your town wants to grant favor to one or the other of the carriers. Consider this the step... that wont ratchet back anytime soon.
29.
by wickedlogic 9y ago
... could you say that again in a nicer tone. I went to away to my quiet space and couldn't hear you. <slips into quiet space again>
30.
by wickedlogic 9y ago
I'm seeing 404 for the images, wonder if it auto-reports that.

More ›