whatever1616

7 ms·

1.
by whatever1616 5mo ago
> No, but they have the scale where that level of specialty makes sense. McDonald's has food chemists on staff, but the local burger joint does not. Now they do, they didnt always, you have to start from somewhere, you always start
2.
by whatever1616 5mo ago
> Only the very biggest platforms (e.g. Google, Microsoft, Apple) should be spending any time on "design systems". Like what they have some superior knowledge or ability to design ? Let me remind you they weren't always te
3.
by whatever1616 5mo ago
>AI Phone where everything is done / seen on the lock screen (AI generates the visuals as you text or talk to it) and or its more of a text and voice digital experience less UI. I think more expressive UIs are the future but i disag
4.
by whatever1616 5mo ago
When you aim for familiarity you also make the assumption that someone else's judgement and opinion was and is the correct one, when you question the assumed only then can you make meaningful improvements. See the iphone which was tota
5.
by whatever1616 5mo ago
Thats rather unavoidable to some extent anything thats better is going to be somewhat different
6.
by whatever1616 5mo ago
> sap and salesforce have some of the most notoriously bad ux in the market and yes they make bank. Why ? Since its so notoriously bad why have there been no attempts to improve it ?
7.
by whatever1616 5mo ago
not only possible but sometimes necessary because sometimes you need to sacrifice familiarity and question the assumptions we have to truly make meaningful improvements
8.
by whatever1616 5mo ago
>"design" explicitly relates to products not art a product can be a piece of art and design can and does in practice often go hand in had with art, practically most designers also other than the utilitarian role practice the ar