weird-eye-issue

7 ms·

1.
by weird-eye-issue 3d ago
YC funds companies and we are all aware of that so by saying it's a YC company because they gave them seed money is already exactly the correct wording
2.
by weird-eye-issue 3d ago
Right, that's why it's legal. We all get that
3.
by weird-eye-issue 5d ago
Nobody else is talking about the reusable scripts they create, we are talking about it using inline Python to make edits to files instead of just editing it with the Edit tool. But I don't know why I'm explaining this to you again
4.
by weird-eye-issue 5d ago
My god. They are not reusing the scripts. They are adhoc, inline Python scripts just used to make a single edit. You seem to fundamentally not understand what everyone else is talking about
5.
by weird-eye-issue 5d ago
Sounds like you completely lack all reading comprehension ability LLMs sometimes like to execute one-off Python scripts to make edits to files rather than just calling the edit tool directly. Both are tool calls so saying that you should ha
6.
by weird-eye-issue 5d ago
They don't always have a great concept of time so for something like running a full test suite that takes a long time you should just tell it not to do that
7.
by weird-eye-issue 7d ago
> There was always some tension between "make abstraction layer whose adoption depends on users finding it easier to make your own components with than vanilla CSS, which is not unusually hard" and "sell pre-made component
8.
by weird-eye-issue 7d ago
I'm the founder of a SaaS in the marketing industry with tens of thousands of paying users and we have lots of AI powered workflows where small changes between model versions can make some big differences so whenever we update models w
9.
by weird-eye-issue 7d ago
It's very easy to tell who is not running production applications using these models based on comments like this
10.
by weird-eye-issue 7d ago
I bought Tailwind UI when it first launched and then ended up using it for a product that had a lot of success several years later and would consult the included components anytime I was going to build something in my app but now with AI I
11.
by weird-eye-issue 7d ago
Struggled for funding because their business model collapsed overnight and isn't coming back, this is probably a best case scenario.
12.
by weird-eye-issue 7d ago
These AI tools primarily benefit single person businesses and they are creating a race to the bottom so that's not entirely true
13.
by weird-eye-issue 8d ago
Do you travel? I've visited several countries in the past couple of years, and everywhere I go I see AI-generated images used widely by businesses.
14.
by weird-eye-issue 9d ago
> PS: does the Android app make you tap like four times to switch to max quality even when you’re on WiFi and told the app years ago to use high quality? Never had this problem. I'm in Thailand and whether I'm on mobile or Wi-F
15.
by weird-eye-issue 10d ago
How does that happen, I thought the referer header was set by the browser how do websites impact what is sent in the context of an embedded YouTube video? If a website could fake their referer header that could be a security risk I think yo
16.
by weird-eye-issue 10d ago
X is honestly among the worst of the worst. People give purposefully bad takes just for the engagement and it's overall super toxic Reddit is awful too, completely accurate things can get downvoted to oblivion because of the hive mind
17.
by weird-eye-issue 10d ago
There is a full screen interstitial ad that appeared right after clicking play now so if you double pressed or lingered a bit or maybe some sort of bug triggered the click then it happened through clicking on that ad
18.
by weird-eye-issue 10d ago
Hmm never seen that in a residential neighborhood, is that a thing? Typically there is not a trash problem simply because the residents are careful enough. Trash doesn't just appear out of nowhere
19.
by weird-eye-issue 11d ago
Just like how you needed to train machine learning models for specific tasks?
20.
by weird-eye-issue 11d ago
> perhaps HOAs for wealthy communities I doubt wealthy HOA communities have much random trash to pick up in the first place
21.
by weird-eye-issue 12d ago
> but those are never discussed. They are literally frequently discussed and it's why there are different benchmarks for different domains.
22.
by weird-eye-issue 12d ago
It's a benchmark for brand new technology and you admit the old score was silly but you think updating it is unscientific?
23.
by weird-eye-issue 12d ago
For relatively complex new features it will automatically do this
24.
by weird-eye-issue 12d ago
> For example, you can say "why is it not committed yet?" and it will give you an explanation and say it's actually ready to be committed. But it won't commit unless you explicitly say so. Well thank God, because that
25.
by weird-eye-issue 13d ago
Fable does a great job from my terrible prompts when coding
26.
by weird-eye-issue 13d ago
I routinely have massive threads using Fable and if anything it only gets better and better over time
27.
by weird-eye-issue 14d ago
Your level of reading comprehension is so incredibly low that it makes full sense why you can't see the difference between local models and the frontier models since you can't actually critically understand what you are reading an
28.
by weird-eye-issue 14d ago
Use Luna for that
29.
by weird-eye-issue 14d ago
Your understanding of this is completely incorrect. You should browse the EU AI Act website more to see what's actually required and educate yourself. Some further reading: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/
30.
by weird-eye-issue 14d ago
It feels odd to call it overthinking when Anthropic has explicitly cited the EU AI Act as the reason they introduced watermarking in the first place. Your "solution" is obviously not enough. It's not effective enough when som

More ›