web41

16 ms·

1.
by web41 4y ago
> Your in-game purchases are yours and you can carry them from one game to another. this is close to what web3 is trying to achieve but with all digital assets like domain names as well. not familiar with roblox but it sounds close to th
2.
by web41 4y ago
> Many apps offer you your data if you want it. but it is still locked into the walled garden. if 5% of Twitter users want to escape the platform when a billionaire buys it and reinstates Trump, their only option is to use an entirely ne
3.
by web41 4y ago
good to know! it would be worth taking a sample of higher value tokens that are not minted by OpenSea. probably the vast majority of those tokens are spam or bots trying to capitalize on existing web content like DeviantArt database. better
4.
by web41 4y ago
centralization is not a bad thing - a lot of NFT websites exist that are centralized and curate and moderate the data on the public ledger to give a better UX for users. there can be multiple of these websites that co-exist - like how you c
5.
by web41 4y ago
not every user needs to run their own blockchain node in order to benefit from its decentralization. and having the option to do so is a good thing.
6.
by web41 4y ago
agree that media storage is not going to be easily decentralized, and most web3 products will depend on big cloud tech companies for storage and services. almost all NFT platforms will extract some % commission from trades as a form of mone
7.
by web41 4y ago
how many of those are minted with OpenSea? and how many are high value - not spam? OpenSea engineers should be shamed for their use of HTTPS URLs in contracts, but it is not the norm outside of their minting platform.
8.
by web41 4y ago
you can run an Ethereum node without running a full node. agree IPFS client is pretty janky but the idea of content addressable p2p hosting is not a bad thing. the goal of these base systems is not to be faster or easier to use than a centr