wealthyyy

6 ms·

1.
by wealthyyy 6y ago
That's why he shipped all code inside one controller.
2.
by wealthyyy 6y ago
> Why would you want Rust to target lowest-common-denominator developers and become new VB or php? Rust wants not that I wants. It seems people replacing NodeJS with it.
3.
by wealthyyy 6y ago
Linus wanted attention and C++ was perfect. Later down the road, he even ranted about Java. It's clear he is a hater of OOP and Abstraction in general. Now, Linus Cultists promotes Data Oriented Design. The attention thing said by Bjar
4.
by wealthyyy 6y ago
Reminds me that unprofitable hotness electric car company whose core business is to manipulate both balance sheet and government.
5.
by wealthyyy 6y ago
This guy wants to write an implant in Rust, but he forgets that Rust is like C, and its very easy RE. Oh, I do remember we had cool kidz writing implants in Go, C# What a failure! That's why the NSA and GRU selected Modern C++! He sele
6.
by wealthyyy 6y ago
The C++ example on leetcode front page is dead wrong. It use that "using namespace std" thingie.
7.
by wealthyyy 6y ago
That's what I implied on my last sentence. Pattern-oriented tracking.
8.
by wealthyyy 6y ago
You pay cost for branch predictions at Runtime. You can avoid it at compile-time using Templates or even constexpr. .
9.
by wealthyyy 6y ago
Accenture used C# for a HFT shop but that shop went away from it to C++. Java is not popular in HFT other than 2-3 shops using it. C++ is best choice IMHO. It has become easy to use it and plus you can get compile time branch prediction wit
10.
by wealthyyy 6y ago
Everyone was afraid that someone was watching them, but they are missing the fact that it's is difficult to watch everyone. Even with algorithms, I don't think it's possible. Essentially, I believe the three letter agencies a
11.
by wealthyyy 6y ago
I built my own language recently and called it Casi-no.
12.
by wealthyyy 6y ago
How come people forget Critical Thinking? It's obvious Critical Thinking helps to learn programming.
13.
by wealthyyy 6y ago
I don't give .... Well what. It's obvious who you are. You are Lucky... Account age is biased way to trust an individual. I could have bought an old HN account from someone but I didn't.
14.
by wealthyyy 6y ago
No. I've tested it anyway.
15.
by wealthyyy 6y ago
Mr Flow, Please try a TMobile number on ZipWhip. You will see it fails. You will now claim that I am lying and that NetNumber has fixed this. So there is nothing I can do to help you. I have known about this attack since 2012, but I did not
16.
by wealthyyy 6y ago
How come you forget about HLR? Banks can see. There are lot of APIs on the web that provides this capability. One example, https://www.messagebird.com/lookup/
17.
by wealthyyy 6y ago
https://positive-tech.com/products/signalling-firewall/ Please try attacking this Firewall.
18.
by wealthyyy 6y ago
This attack is based on a Routing network not SS7. CDMA carriers don't use SS7 for SMS unless you're on Roaming.
19.
by wealthyyy 6y ago
The Banks already has anti fraud detection systems in place to detect Roaming attacks. They can see whether number is Roaming enabled or not. The Telecoms do prevent it with Firewalls. As for CDMA, Please see, https://www.wyden.s
20.
by wealthyyy 6y ago
Both articles provides zero evidence other than concept of attack in general and all of them just claiming that mobile numbers can be hacked.
21.
by wealthyyy 6y ago
Look, Any Vice reporter can be bribed. You're missing the point.
22.
by wealthyyy 6y ago
You are personally attacking me for no reason. What does my other comments has to do with this comment? I don't care whether you believe me or not. This is a fake news at it's best. Regarding my comments, [1] That lady is self mar
23.
by wealthyyy 6y ago
Please see my comments at this thread, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26468892 A lot of people confirmed this as FUD.
24.
by wealthyyy 6y ago
All your references are pointing to Lucky225 who is trying to market his anti-fraud product. NetNumber has no competitors. It's a routing database. The Vice article is a paid piece. This attack doesn't work with any of US Mobile c
25.
by wealthyyy 6y ago
You don't need LOAs. You need a contract and an API with a upstream provider where you can attack numbers real-time.
26.
by wealthyyy 6y ago
This is not a SS7 attack. SS7 attacks doesn't work in practice. Eg A lot of carriers in US are CDMA. GSMA Carriers like AT&T has great firewalls in place to block SS7 attacks. Further, You can detect SS7 attacks. Major Banks alread
27.
by wealthyyy 6y ago
The attack also works with Canadian carriers.
28.
by wealthyyy 6y ago
This applies to Canada as-well
29.
by wealthyyy 6y ago
Mr Krebs, Please do your due diligence. The attack vector only works for Landlines, VOIP, Toll-free. Upstream agreements already block Mobile carriers. Further, SMS from Short Codes are blocked by default. You can only receive SMS from long
30.
by wealthyyy 6y ago
Jony Ive - Introducing Swift Actors .......

More ›