wcski

6 ms·

1.
by wcski 1y ago
You also hedged with "pretty much".
2.
by wcski 1y ago
Eh. Depends on how it's deployed and used, doesn't it? To me, it's like calling a bouncer at a club a private investigator.
3.
by wcski 1y ago
This article lost me when it counted identity verification software as "surveillance tech".
4.
by wcski 1y ago
Congrats on the launch! I personally am not sure I see the value in paying for a course, when (I assume) I can do this on my own by feeding a video link or file to an LLM and asking it to generate a course. I'm sure your courses are pr
5.
by wcski 1y ago
It's people gathering for coffee. We can't talk about the apocalypse at the dinner table every night.
6.
by wcski 2y ago
but does it have touch screen -_-
7.
by wcski 2y ago
The difference is that the intent of malware is to disrupt. Is gasoline useless just because it explodes when you light a match next to it? edit to add: OSS is not inherently more secure than closed source.
8.
by wcski 2y ago
I assume from your rhetorical question that you don't. I personally don't know enough about it to say whether it does or not - but, I will make what I believe is a reasonable assumption and say that all else being equal, yes, a fl
9.
by wcski 2y ago
> Closed source security software is too often malware by design. Can you be more specific? Genuinely curious what you mean here.
10.
by wcski 2y ago
I understand your preference. I have two questions: 1) Do you think that an organization should have no protections in place? 2) Why not just work from the machine they provided you, and do everything else on a personal machine?
11.
by wcski 2y ago
iPadOS still doesn't have a native calculator.
12.
by wcski 7y ago
If Satya got hit by a bus this weekend that "pointless" board would become very important very quickly.