Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
waterthrowaway
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
waterthrowaway
4d ago
I think I would describe it as a visualization of how sea level, snow cover and vegetation will change given a change in surface temperature. The trouble is it is not an accurate visualization of climate change . I am on mobile now, but if
2.
▲
by
waterthrowaway
5d ago
This does not simulate climate change and you should not describe it as such
3.
▲
by
waterthrowaway
8d ago
Yes, I was agreeing with you. I apologize for being unclear.
4.
▲
by
waterthrowaway
8d ago
Hmmm... I see a legend
5.
▲
by
waterthrowaway
8d ago
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/201...
6.
▲
by
waterthrowaway
8d ago
For a USA county level assesment of climate risk I reccomend this site https://map.climatevulnerabilityindex.org/map/cvi_overall/us...
7.
▲
by
waterthrowaway
8d ago
As a researcher in this general area I would not say 2m by 2100 is a consensus view of the worst case scenario see [1]. Here is a useful scenario for understanding what different SLR scenarios mean for the states [2] [1] https://
8.
▲
by
waterthrowaway
3mo ago
As a physical oceanographer, the destruction of these observing systems is horrific. It is hard to stress enough how intentionally OMB is trying to disassemble American science. The new (proposed) OMB guidelines prohibit international colla
9.
▲
by
waterthrowaway
1y ago
I would be curious if you have any source for this. I spent about 30 minutes looking through google scholar looking for studies from the 1980s which included snow projections under climate change to no avail. I even got an account to a brit
10.
▲
by
waterthrowaway
1y ago
see also: https://www.science.org/content/article/nsf-and-nih-suspend-... These grants make up about 75-80% of all NSF grants
11.
▲
Federal government suspends research funding to UCLA
(dailybruin.com)
4 points
by
waterthrowaway
1y ago
|
0 comments
12.
▲
Live from NASA GISS, kicking-off the Weather and Climate 100-hour livestream
(youtube.com)
2 points
by
waterthrowaway
1y ago
|
0 comments
13.
▲
National Snow and Ice Data Center changes service level to key sea ice datasets
(nsidc.org)
5 points
by
waterthrowaway
1y ago
|
1 comments
14.
▲
by
waterthrowaway
1y ago
KDE+arch works perfectly out of the box
15.
▲
by
waterthrowaway
2y ago
This is really cool! Thank you for submitting it! It is worth noting this is for the purpose of video games or visual effects not for scientific/operational simulations of the ocean. Daily operational wave forecasts are available from
16.
▲
'Cruel and thoughtless': Trump fires hundreds at US climate agency Noaa
(theguardian.com)
30 points
by
waterthrowaway
2y ago
|
2 comments
17.
▲
U.S. to pull delegation from UN climate science meeting (IPCC)
(axios.com)
8 points
by
waterthrowaway
2y ago
|
1 comments
18.
▲
What are teleconnections? Connecting climate via global information highways
(climate.gov)
1 points
by
waterthrowaway
2y ago
|
1 comments
19.
▲
by
waterthrowaway
2y ago
Rossby waves are fascinating waves in the earth's climate system that are not due to gravity like surface water waves but rather the rotation of the earth. They play a very important role in weather and climate.
20.
▲
by
waterthrowaway
2y ago
In the field of Geophysical Fluid Dynamics it is an important distinction as there are other very important waves. Rossby waves are not gravity waves and extremely important to the global climate (see their role in ENSO dynamics). Compressi
21.
▲
by
waterthrowaway
2y ago
In this case it seems ocean heat content is a depth integrated measure (see page 11 of this document I found by following links in the above article https://upper-ocean-dynamics.earth.miami.edu/_assets/pdf/atb... )
22.
▲
by
waterthrowaway
3y ago
The AMOC is one of the most studied climate phenomenon. We have known for decades that with a large enough freshwater forcing in models you can shut it down. The question is how big is the forcing needed and do the models accurately represe
23.
▲
by
waterthrowaway
4y ago
Quick clarification: the noise is applied as a perturbation of their model which is meant to tease out its response to high frequency variation in sst. It is not really a limitation of their model but part of its design.
24.
▲
by
waterthrowaway
4y ago
I believe noise here just refers to high frequency variation in atmospheric forcing. The ocean can be thought of as adding inertia to the climate system like a massive flywheel. This means it reacts slowly to change. This paper is arguing t
25.
▲
by
waterthrowaway
5y ago
If you are interested in the irreducible imprecision of climate models this paper is fun too https://www.pnas.org/content/104/21/8709
26.
▲
by
waterthrowaway
5y ago
Hello! I’m a physical oceanographer which means my job is to figure out how the water moves and delivers heat through things like math and models. Paleoclimate isn’t my expertise but I figured I’d chime in on some of the climate skepticism