wastewaste

10 ms·

1.
by wastewaste 9y ago
absolute non sequitur. I'd just think burning the stuff was mad destructive.
2.
by wastewaste 9y ago
I wasn't so much disagreeing with the implied statement as I was criticizing your expression. You didn't add anything to the discussion I didn't read better in other comments. Point in case the focus is on the ratio of brains
3.
by wastewaste 9y ago
no shittin, a full sized human can't bear a full sized human. I think that's the same for all animals, though and doesn't explain the difference, unless you implied dolphins carry their unborn for way longer. which they don&#
4.
by wastewaste 9y ago
don't you as a programmer feel familiar with longidentifiers. Would you prefer in dent a-gogo ers? Yes, my latin is lacking.
5.
by wastewaste 9y ago
that's relative. the further your frame of reference expands, the older the image of earth observable at the border of the frame of reference is, so a few billion light years out, even earth would look boring. And even if that still im
6.
by wastewaste 9y ago
You answered to a strawman argument, supporting it even. But its a loosing game for you, because you submit to a dogmatized interpretation that is easy to refute saying nothing would be as black and white as implied by the argument. Parent
7.
by wastewaste 9y ago
Brave new world is not comparable to 1984, quite simply, because ... one is about lack of empathy, the other lack of information.
8.
by wastewaste 9y ago
There might be some of the humans, who we grant special status, who are below the average dolphin, which calls the whole idea into question.
9.
by wastewaste 9y ago
This is all hyperbole. From the egoistic perspective, live is just a figment of imagination, there is no other, just ego. This might sound like a matter of semantics, but it reminds me of this: Virtue is mainly a question of how to treat on
10.
by wastewaste 9y ago
In my humble opinion, Nihilism is the philosophical base for everything else. "fall back on" would be suitable. Point in case, the empty set is the initial element of set theory, as zero is the first element of the natural numbers
11.
by wastewaste 9y ago
not to forget, naming is one of the harder problems considered in programming.
12.
by wastewaste 9y ago
> epsilon set N, s.t. N is the minimal set s.t. an element zero exists in N and there exists a function succ in the set N -> N, this is recursive, which is just how a function like succ works (with a bit more work, anyway) but the def
13.
by wastewaste 9y ago
> the Foundations of Mathematics should give a precise deﬁnition of what a mathematical statement is and what a mathematical proof is. I don't see a difference between precise definition and mathematical statement in this context, s
14.
by wastewaste 9y ago
Is this as pronnounced in Germany?
15.
by wastewaste 9y ago
You sound like a lawyer and I don't mean that as a compliment. But alright, if this isn't a flaw, then breaking it wasn't an achievement, certainly quantum computation wouldn't be an achievement - or rather foreseeing an
16.
by wastewaste 9y ago
tricky grammar. You mean formal, mathematical verification instead of simulation, I suppose, but I am not aware of any different method.
17.
by wastewaste 9y ago
What if - I like this inversion of expression - what if it really is a war on drugs, not against ? After all, amphetamin was popularized under the Nazis, e.g. The CIA supplied cocain to vietnamese contras. Soldiers are fully dependent on
18.
by wastewaste 9y ago
> besides making them feel guilty and pathetic when they relapse I don't see how a bit of time to reflect and cope in a careful environment is strictly a bad thing. You reinforce a stereotype that is not helpful to those to whom it
19.
by wastewaste 9y ago
because of renewed formular? I'm no pharmacist nor chemist, but my impression with drugs is that the popular names and actual composition are two different things. All they need is approval and if it helps relieve or avoid addiction I&
20.
by wastewaste 9y ago
> for something as crucial as [computer games] fixed