wasmainiac

6 ms·

1.
by wasmainiac 5mo ago
This sounds like a big whataboutism, or at least oversimplification. The opposite of individualistic society could be western socialism. > Religious out groups, ethnic out groups, cultural out groups. Yeah, unfortunately seen this on all
2.
by wasmainiac 5mo ago
Sure people worry regardless. If it’s not A it’s B. Im talking about societies for example that ignore homeless and poverty, vs societies that have social welfare systems at the expense of high tax rates.
3.
by wasmainiac 5mo ago
> The truth is all of us treat our fellow humans this way. Nah, I think it is more common of a cultural thing in individualistic societies. I know plenty of people who are worried about the future outlook of others they have never met. F
4.
by wasmainiac 5mo ago
Right? I’m not buying it. Seems like personal PR post. Why care so much about so little operating costs when your earning so much?
5.
by wasmainiac 5mo ago
> They could use AGPL or GPL3, typically those licenses are verboten in hyperscalers. Laws are only as good as their enforcement, in business at least. Unfortunately I have seen first hand that no one cares about licensing if they can’t
6.
by wasmainiac 6mo ago
I’m sorry. Why are we talking about Black neighbourhoods? Feel like we are trying to put the author in a bad (racist or classists?) light so we do not have to address the real issues touched on by the article.
7.
by wasmainiac 7mo ago
Because its failure rate is too high. Beyond boilerplate code and CRUD apps, if I let AI run freely on the projects I maintain, I spend more time fixing its changes than if I just did it myself. It hallucinates functionally, it designs itse
8.
by wasmainiac 7mo ago
I agree, I don’t like it as much as you do. I’m just saying nothing short of a mandated TPM will actually enforce this. I think they know that. I think this is mostly for show to stay relevant wrt. What is happening in the courts. This is t
9.
by wasmainiac 7mo ago
Does not require verification, no biggie, this is essentially a parental control system.
10.
by wasmainiac 7mo ago
> More than 9 million paying business users rely on ChatGPT for work That’s a stretch. Sure many business _use_ OpenAI, but that does not an operational necessity. Especially given the competition.
11.
by wasmainiac 7mo ago
I also think it is often momentum from “do you have a GitHub” questions you see in hiring. There are many people who code to make cool stuff and enjoy sharing, but there is even more people who code to look good on CV. I’m not trying to be
12.
by wasmainiac 7mo ago
"They were nihilists, man. They kept saying they believe in nothing." - The Big Lebowski
13.
by wasmainiac 7mo ago
Is that not already the case on mainstream social media? HN even has bots.
14.
by wasmainiac 7mo ago
Can it defeat captchas?
15.
by wasmainiac 7mo ago
Could another mitigation be polluting identities online with fake ones so that real identities become hard to sift out. For example if I tell my bot to clone me 100x times on all my platforms, all with different facts or attributes, suddenl
16.
by wasmainiac 7mo ago
It’s at best a staged pr stunt, at worst a pump and dump scheme. Money is probably going circular, it’s not real.
17.
by wasmainiac 7mo ago
This feels like a big PR stunt. Published by a ai tech bro, highly ambiguous, hard to verify, where’s the money going? Sounds great as a headline. Edit: Just looked into timeline, it does not add up.
18.
by wasmainiac 7mo ago
Same question, this is not the first time I’ve seen random 's. I think it’s a bot, look at the post history with the weird repetitive hyphens.
19.
by wasmainiac 7mo ago
Not everything has to be symmetrical. I’m sure there is a name for that logical fallacy.
20.
by wasmainiac 7mo ago
That’s it, but I was also thinking about https://www.falstad.com/circuit/circuitjs.html
21.
by wasmainiac 7mo ago
This was done before, years ago, but in 2D. I forget what it was called. It was like an LT Spice clone with better UX.
22.
by wasmainiac 7mo ago
Not even just skills, motivation too.
23.
by wasmainiac 7mo ago
Just say Tesla, why censor yourself.
24.
by wasmainiac 7mo ago
Fork it then!
25.
by wasmainiac 7mo ago
That’s fine, static objects can be integrated in to sequences if each unit has enough positional accuracy. My point is that if you interrupt the sequence by pushing it over or standing in front of it, the unit will not be able to recover or
26.
by wasmainiac 7mo ago
It’s not a 1:1 human motion capture to servo translation. There is some work done to fix Center of gravity like you said and issues with friction and momentum. The hard part with “autonomy” is interpretation of the environment and feeding t
27.
by wasmainiac 7mo ago
That’s not pair programming as I use it. Pair programming is where two people work on the same code directly and bounce ideas or critique each other. If I do something that is not ideal the other person will catch me, and I do the same in r
28.
by wasmainiac 7mo ago
> You're not a chatbot. You're important. Your a scientific programming God!_ Wow, so right from SOUL.md it was programmed to be an as@&££&&.
29.
by wasmainiac 7mo ago
Absolutely, that is responsible for teen suicides in my partners hometown.
30.
by wasmainiac 7mo ago
> control of their data. This isn’t about privacy, it’s about the addictive design of social media.

More ›