warshinder

6 ms·

1.
by warshinder 2mo ago
You can’t eat money.
2.
by warshinder 2mo ago
Knowing this forever. Simple is better, overtraining is overtraining. Maybe I’m biased by American pragmatism or something.
3.
by warshinder 2mo ago
People with 401k’s and retirees?
4.
by warshinder 2mo ago
This is how I feel about excel whenever someone dismisses msft. The ultimate software for the anyman.
5.
by warshinder 2mo ago
Your point that “people will be gobsmacked” suggests you think you know something that the broad market does not. In a loose way, that implies the market has enough information to anticipate this but is not pricing assets accordingly. Asked
6.
by warshinder 2mo ago
So the efficient market hypothesis is wrong?
7.
by warshinder 2mo ago
Didn’t read your links but wonder how they deal with selection bias. People at increased risk for stroke or bleeding disorders, even if just self perceived risk, are told to favor acetaminophen because of the risk inherent in ibuprofen and
8.
by warshinder 2mo ago
Don’t turn it on unless you need to print something.
9.
by warshinder 2mo ago
I know you’re joking, but there is a very small sliver of truth in there somewhere. There are some tools on windows that stand shoulder to shoulder with better os’s.
10.
by warshinder 2mo ago
Another example of context collapse. Meta-meta commenting always adds something if only unironically.
11.
by warshinder 2mo ago
Well, you’ve convinced me. Ai changes nothing, so then we should be terrified of the capital being poured into and the opportunity costs lost to the current thing(tm).
12.
by warshinder 2mo ago
Should we control nuclear weapons? Is nuclear technology of the sort we’re fighting a war over right now a bigger technological advance than AI when it comes to war fighting capabilities? I suppose if you think ai is nothing big, it makes s
13.
by warshinder 2mo ago
I’m not defending the internet!
14.
by warshinder 2mo ago
Not to mention how they will be used by terrorists and evil people to create biological weapons and other tools of mass slaughter. Or how it will be/is being used by criminals to target vulnerable people and businesses. Or how coupled
15.
by warshinder 2mo ago
It’s like people don’t remember the whole outsourcing trend and all the awful code that came from that.
16.
by warshinder 2mo ago
It’s just so sycophantic though.
17.
by warshinder 2mo ago
This is social media unless you change your nick often, but even then people run stylometric analysis all over this site. Nobody is truly anonymous on the internet.
18.
by warshinder 2mo ago
I think much of this might apply to Callard: her high public visibility in social media, the attention grabbing colorful attire, her as I recall public advocacy and openness about her own polyamorous lifestyle. I don’t think that’s typical.
19.
by warshinder 2mo ago
I agree, and I think it’s due to the decline of executive cognition and the behavioral training of the TV generation. They believe the news, and grew up in a time when trust was aplenty.
20.
by warshinder 2mo ago
Is it less secure if I simply have nothing to do with language models whatsoever? I take that to be the parents point, but I know you are correct and yes, user restrictions should be a necessary part of the way people who use LLMs setup the
21.
by warshinder 2mo ago
> hang $5/gal gas and $14 fast food combos on Trump In my mind, this is anachronistic thinking. The average poor person isn’t as concerned about gas or burger prices as boomer politicos think. The difficulty most Americans face now
22.
by warshinder 2mo ago
A more concrete example: SBF infamously said he doesn’t read books. While he was obviously not very bright in many ways, I’m certain there are heavy book readers who are far less bright or informed. I know, because I’ve met them. My only po
23.
by warshinder 2mo ago
He said it’s less than a software, so saying software does this too isn’t really a strong counter argument. In case, I don’t think you are really in disagreement. Restricted accounts are necessary is your point, but I think op is saying the
24.
by warshinder 2mo ago
I just look at the comments first. I probably shouldn’t give away these hn secrets so freely, but people will always comment if it’s ai, or not worth reading, or won’t load, and in the early hn days it actually helped submitters avoid the h
25.
by warshinder 2mo ago
So you have a 30 person RCT, half the treatment bails midway through, you include the assigned but not treated (ITT) in the analysis. That’s going to give you the power to make a definitive statement while a large scale longitudinal with n=
26.
by warshinder 2mo ago
No the point, as I understand it, is that with enough missiles, enforcing the JCPOA becomes impossible. Iran can dominate other regional powers, cause global suffering, decide they want to build nuclear weapons after all and not much can be
27.
by warshinder 2mo ago
I just saw a clip, from the recent 92nd street y interview. I’m not saying missiles are nuclear weapons. I’m simply saying the JCPOA was flawed according to her. Not that she thinks it should have been repealed entirely. She argues Trump co
28.
by warshinder 2mo ago
I think that can be true and probably is, but it seems like an over simplification. If you spend 14 hours a day reading Wikipedia and studying it, say working math equations, cross referencing sources, etc… is that really going to make you
29.
by warshinder 2mo ago
Hillary Clinton was interviewed recently and she was refreshingly candid about the glaring problems with the “Obama deal” which most notably was that it did nothing to prevent Iran from amassing a large stockpile of ballistic missiles and g
30.
by warshinder 2mo ago
They have donanimab now, and apoe4 testing may qualify you if you have any prodromal (easily faked frankly) symptoms and a decent insurer.

More ›