walletdrainer

5 ms·

1.
by walletdrainer 3mo ago
Calling someone a "fucking idiot" is far kinder than falsely accusing them of being a LLM poster, but I don't even see a flag on the comment which I was replying to. Do you just have a preference for better disguised insults?
2.
by walletdrainer 3mo ago
lol
3.
by walletdrainer 3mo ago
> How can we know the IRA “won”? In signing the GFA, the UK effectively gave up on it's sovereignty over NI. That was never going to happen through "peaceful and democratic means"
4.
by walletdrainer 3mo ago
>And even then mostly because a lot of people were supportive of their cause even if they were against their methods But IRA didn't win because those people supported their cause, IRA won despite those people being against their met
5.
by walletdrainer 3mo ago
There's no credit due for correctly reading your adversary? Obviously the Israelis could have just kept their mask on, but Hamas was clearly correct in their calculation that they wouldn't.
6.
by walletdrainer 3mo ago
[flagged]
7.
by walletdrainer 3mo ago
>We tried that. That didn't work. Ah yes, because businesses just love to turn down free money. >Once again, nobody is asking that. So you are misunderstanding SKG. If SKG really does not want games to remain playable after EOL,
8.
by walletdrainer 3mo ago
>> You're suggesting a subsidy for gamers which everyone else would to pay for >No, that's not how it works. Not even close. As far as I can tell, legislation which enables you to play a game in perpetuity instead of for
9.
by walletdrainer 3mo ago
> but due to you actively portraying your opposition as malicious It's extremely difficult to see how the statement quoted below is not fairly characterized as malicious >The industry should only be allowed to comment after the
10.
by walletdrainer 3mo ago
[flagged]
11.
by walletdrainer 3mo ago
It's particularly funny because "monster-in-the-middle" appears to be a deliberately quirky marketing term invented by cloudflare.
12.
by walletdrainer 3mo ago
Those sources feel more than slightly contrived.
13.
by walletdrainer 3mo ago
>I'm a bit confused about why you are still wondering They did admit to being German.
14.
Beyond MitM: The Rising Danger of Adversary-in-the-Middle Attacks(blog.barracuda.com)
2 points by walletdrainer 3mo ago|0 comments
15.
by walletdrainer 3mo ago
If something like this had been implemented 20 years ago, we'd probably be exactly where we are now. What's the point?
16.
by walletdrainer 3mo ago
Maybe look at how people actually use it? Not sure why the Indian blogspam is worth looking at. "Engagement" has a specific meaning. It's different from "like farming" or "karma farming". Some platforms sp
17.
by walletdrainer 3mo ago
> There is no guarantee that they will be a big part of the stock market. It is not "absolutely" sure, for them or for any new public stock It's really hard to believe that you'd be writing this in good faith. In re
18.
by walletdrainer 3mo ago
[flagged]
19.
by walletdrainer 4mo ago
> The biggest mistake I made was high uptime. arjie.com was up for 10 years plus on a Hetzner VPS so that by the time they wanted to sunset the machine underlying I had no idea what my teenage self had set up. I have the backups but the
20.
by walletdrainer 4mo ago
Also, you just don’t get LLM-isms at this rate if you’re simply using them for translation. (From the common commercially available products)
21.
by walletdrainer 4mo ago
Yes, but academic HPC environments are very 90s and are far from what is generally considered reasonable in 2026.
22.
by walletdrainer 4mo ago
> Rather: Josef Průša is not a native English speaker (his mother tongue is Czech). Are you joking? Guy has been tweeting in English for almost two decades, that’s not the problem. Here's the frequency of the " - " pattern
23.
by walletdrainer 4mo ago
> Can we make the kernel vulns less important? Local kernel vulns are totally unimportant in any vaguely reasonable environment.
24.
by walletdrainer 4mo ago
Banal accusations? Here's the frequency of the " - " pattern in tweets by "josefprusa" 2020: 8 / 761 tweets = 1.1% 2021: 5 / 533 tweets = 0.9% 2022: 9 / 597 tweets = 1.5% 2023: 21 &#x2
25.
by walletdrainer 4mo ago
You can come upon such information by other means In sports? Perhaps you just observe a player get injured in a car accident and bet based on that.
26.
by walletdrainer 4mo ago
The information contained within might be accurate, but the information clearly wasn’t important enough for the person posting it to actually bother communicating it like a normal human being. That’s pretty telling!
27.
by walletdrainer 4mo ago
Do people genuinely not understand how stupid it makes them look when they copypaste ChatGPT output onto social media like this? Based on his tweets, Josef seems like a guy incapable of coming up with his own original thoughts.
28.
by walletdrainer 4mo ago
> AI-generated text is worth skepticism, but humans can be idiots and spout nonsense too. Sure, but anyone posting chains of incredibly long LLM generated tweets can safely be ignored as an utter moron.
29.
by walletdrainer 4mo ago
The tweets by Josef Prusa also seem LLM generated, this whole story is slop.
30.
by walletdrainer 4mo ago
There are two different schools of thought: 1) It’s OK to do just about anything to win a CTF, including installing malware on the organisers computers months before the actual event so you’ll have an easy time stealing the flags. 2) It’s n

More ›