waffles4all

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by waffles4all 13y ago

   My position is in line with the scientific majority. This is not new by any stretch of the imagination. Taking issue with the assumptions used in this already established finding could suggest you either (1) don't know much about subje
2. 2.▲
   by waffles4all 13y ago

   You use many assumptions too: take all of your questions and take the negative, you can't show them either. I am a practicing scientist, I work in alternative energy and develop semiconductors. I am not a climatologist, and it is not l
3. 3.▲
   by waffles4all 13y ago

   >>And replace it with what? You can't phase something out until you have a replacement. (Or you could send everyone back to a 19th century standard of living.) This is what came to mind while reading OP's and your comment: O
4. 4.▲
   by waffles4all 13y ago

   A minor point, the direct peak intensity is not 1 kWm^-2 at AM 1. AM1.5G is the standard spectrum and it is acquired at an oblique angle of 48.2 degrees from zenith. It is typically normalized to 1 kWm^-2 due to the inherent variability enc