w7

7 ms·

1.
by w7 2mo ago
The few socialist papers that I've read make the claim that there is nothing to pay attention to, and that the event is "American Propaganda" to try and make Venezuela look weak. The government attempts to control and suppres
2.
by w7 2mo ago
Venezuela's own choices. https://rsf.org/en/venezuela-censorship-exacerbates-earthqua...
3.
by w7 8mo ago
It's funny to me as well. Being initially inspired by Yelp's dockersh I wrote a functional MVP of the same concept around 2 years ago. It used a custom Go sshd-proxy to spawn kata-container backed pods in kubernetes. I used it per
4.
by w7 1y ago
I think it may be in use by tools without people being aware. I decided to check my workstation for it just in case, figuring the file would be empty, or not exist. Instead it seems to be populated with what seem to be Heroku API and git cr
5.
by w7 2y ago
Something that I've noticed that somehow ends up lost when people learn "the model" is the encapsulation aspects. I don't know if it's missing in people's course work or what, but I've had to use http:&#x
6.
by w7 3y ago
Kaliningrad/Königsberg is a more apt comparison then? Because that's functionally what the CCCP did.
7.
by w7 3y ago
What do we consider "forced out of their home and livelihood". Allied bombing of Japan in WWII destroyed upwards of 3.4 million homes and rendered the areas unlivable for a period of time.
8.
by w7 3y ago
Is this not just related to the Dual_EC_DRBG and other tainted RNG issues we've known about, and mitigated, for years? You can see discussion on this going on as far back as 2015, explicitly in regards to what "SIGINT enabled&quot
9.
by w7 3y ago
They're fairly well known in networking circles. They're basically THE company for buying cheap, but functional, networking bits-and-bobs-- either in bulk, or as an alternative to prowling ebay for smaller purchases. I use them al
10.
by w7 3y ago
What makes you say that? Mussolini was in Milan, and stayed in Milan, when he ordered the coup march to Rome. Mussolini lead his coup from >100-600km away from the march, why would the leader of Wagner need to be in the convoy?
11.
by w7 3y ago
What makes NAT the "main factor" for that. I'm pretty sure every consumer router since at least 2002, if not further back, has had some stateful firewall implementation with default deny rules.
12.
by w7 3y ago
Would you need the principles of structure engineering to assess that house's toaster? Much like a house is more than just the structure itself, so is the realm of computers.
13.
by w7 3y ago
I'm not sure I understand. Generally in Go: functions, structs, and consts are namespaced in a way I think is familiar to most, by package origin. If something is not, then it's either a function/struct in the same namespace
14.
by w7 3y ago
I'm not sure I'd describe the golang community's attitude as a complete write-off of frameworks. I don't think I personally know a Go developer who doesn't use some sort of web framework (I personally use Echo, for
15.
by w7 3y ago
Some examples for anyone else reading: Go: https://github.com/kyleconroy/sqlc Rust: https://github.com/cornucopia-rs/cornucopia This is my preferred method of interacting with databases now, if av
16.
by w7 3y ago
You can get some of properties you describe with the behavior most people would want via a combination of anycast, some route exchange protocol (probably BGP), and ECMP.
17.
by w7 3y ago
It has: * Relatively simple syntax. * "Good enough" expressivity-- nothing that's considered "missing" has been a true blocker for most projects. * An easily accessible concurrency primitive, with the bonus that the
18.
by w7 3y ago
> This is the !very first! statement of the opening paragraph of my comment. Why are you saying that I have not said it. Have you not read the actual comment? > Why would they be relied upon if they exist, even further, why would they
19.
by w7 3y ago
> How does this justify removing an actual historic term from the vocabulary. Language mutates. > It amazes me how someone that claims any insight in the matters of law can ask for 'sources' for such a thing. It just feels c
20.
by w7 3y ago
Do we have a different understanding of the word "rely"? You didn't even use the word "BASED". When you say: > It does not rely on agreements, contracts, negotiations or precedents. Why would they exist conceptua
21.
by w7 3y ago
> Long standing in history, long standing in diplomacy, long standing in actual freaking Louis XIV administration communique, long standing in practically everything. That's neat, the dead are welcome to their opinions. That doesn&#
22.
by w7 3y ago
Their entire statement of > civil law system ... does not rely on agreements, contracts, negotiations or precedents. It cannot be 'interpreted' betrays that they've never examined legal proceedings in either system. Contra
23.
by w7 3y ago
Long standing in what circles? I've only seen it in Russian derived or connected media, political think, and institutions. The primary source of papers using that term to refer to US law seems to be the Russian State University of Just
24.
by w7 3y ago
> these were amateurs who didnt know that in Anglosaxon common law, you have to avoid being honest about anything and even deny any wrongdoing even if you get caught the act of murdering someone Ignoring the "Anglosaxon" buzzwo
25.
by w7 3y ago
Pretending there isn't a difference between "opinionated views" and collaborating with Russian military while spreading disinformation doesn't help you. The examples you've provided have done the latter. Stop using
26.
by w7 3y ago
It's not even close. You're comparing a time sensitive attack with tons of security to 4 pipes sitting in the ocean. A lone attacker on a short time scale, versus a potential entire state backed demolitions team with tons of opera
27.
by w7 3y ago
It's not. Instead of trying to come up with convoluted analogies for my conclusion to try and paint it as outlandish, maybe go back to talking about off topic stuff like BRICS.
28.
by w7 3y ago
That's neat, why does Stark have this to say about the issue himself though? https://twitter.com/holger_stark/status/1638561100009549829 "But this is, at least in respect to our work at @DIEZEIT, complet
29.
by w7 3y ago
It's highly unlikely that someone with the capacity to deploy a team to covertly sabotage a pipeline decides to back out 3/4 of the way when in they're in such close proximity, or fails and their failure is never detected (th
30.
by w7 3y ago
So the US who "has been the one demanding they stop existing" covertly places explosives on 3/4 pipes, and ignores the last pipe despite direct proximity to the others? "Russia has been the one wanting all the pipelines

More ›