vokep

7 ms·

1.
by vokep 5y ago
This got me to some interesting thinking. If the library contains no information because you need the information you look for, what about the ability of it to at least match to information you look for? Or put another way, the library does
2.
by vokep 5y ago
I wish I could look at this as a joke...haha
3.
by vokep 5y ago
It's a new implementation of the same thing, but now with no team, no servers, no company, just some code that runs on the blockchain (which is a ton of servers lol)
4.
by vokep 5y ago
Is this really a meaningful thing? I mean, of course it is somewhat in terms of how things are viewed. But, theres no religious law that NFTs must be a pure blockchain thing. Possibly they're finding their niche, and that is to be a so
5.
by vokep 5y ago
But they aren't. They're pieces of cardboard with a particular story. The card has no value itself, which is why a rookie card isn't very valuable, unless its of someone famous. Why? because one is a story right at the beginn
6.
by vokep 5y ago
There are taxes as mining fees
7.
by vokep 5y ago
Who says neural networks aren't in pain when their fitness (reward function) is subtracted from? or happy or orgasmic when the function is bumped up? Pain/pleasure seem to have easy enough analogue to at least something like a rew
8.
by vokep 5y ago
Then the fact anything is would be wrong, which if believed truly leads the only reasonable behavior to be the most destructive behavior (what is, existence, is bad, so destroying it is good). Luckily, its good.
9.
by vokep 5y ago
But it does mean mirrors might be humans/human-like, if humans are actually reducable to (self-aware) mirrors.
10.
by vokep 5y ago
Its incredible to think the shape was only discovered in the last few years and not earlier in computing history (80s/90s or earlier). Just goes to show there is still much to be discovered. This is what I come to hacker news for!
11.
by vokep 5y ago
The rate of recovery after first dose, directly correlated with it was plain and clear. If you take a drug and experience significant effects within hours of taking it, you don't question if you randomly would've felt that way any
12.
by vokep 5y ago
72% improvement in 27 early treatment trials and 86% improvement in 14 prophylaxis trials https://ivmmeta.com/ is a bit easier to digest Sure more research is still needed but with these sorts of results so far, if someone
13.
by vokep 5y ago
Of several covid stories of people around me, I've never heard of a recovery like this one. No long haul, nothing at all, everything fits a definition of having been cured. In a few days. Able to do strenuous activity without issue. Al
14.
by vokep 5y ago
I've personally seen it help someone who was getting significantly worse day after day. The effect was undeniable, and makes it infuriating to see claims of the drug as being dangerous or needing more study. Because the FDA is the FDA
15.
by vokep 5y ago
Many of these stories would be prevented if ivermectin was more readily available. Yet the first thing that comes up when googling it is the FDA making baseless claims of it being dangerous. Of course it can be dangerous when people have to
16.
by vokep 5y ago
Whats the actual quantified likelihood of this?
17.
by vokep 5y ago
No, to force anyone into human experimentation is a violation of the Nuremberg Code. Specifically sections 1, 3, and 8. Other sections could be easily argued to be in violation as well, but those 3 seem to be entirely against the current va
18.
by vokep 5y ago
Where can I get a cat like that?
19.
by vokep 5y ago
You initially would for having claimed something interesting is not, however you also started a discussion which is pretty interesting, including your own further comment, which also adds interest to the situation. Paradoxically you two now
20.
by vokep 5y ago
uninteresting to you A lot of discoveries of interesting stuff resulted from something uninteresting being considered interesting and deeply contemplated. Others look and say "what an idiot, spending such time on such uninteresting x&q
21.
by vokep 5y ago
Except sex addiction is, gay or not. It seems uncertain if he really was having gay hookups all the time, or just was using the app. It does seem implied that the data points towards lots of hookups though.
22.
by vokep 5y ago
>Very, very useful. Just to frame it a particular way, biological systems are basically solved nanotechnology, extremely good, self-sustaining, resilient little machines that have spent a long time optimizing to be better and better. B
23.
by vokep 5y ago
Because nothing is precisely what does exist. But nothing implies something, so my working theory is that nothing's implied opposite something is itself the first thing, then some cellular automata like progression results from similar
24.
by vokep 5y ago
Unless I'm mistaken, there is a license to call a port a USB port, though goods are commonly sold without that. In theory the solution is simple: only buy products that have the actual USB logo and ensure certification, and the USB-IF
25.
by vokep 5y ago
Yes. If not having power, that seems upsetting. But...thats how power works, otherwise it isn't powerful.
26.
by vokep 5y ago
>why does everyone assume—when obviously, demonstrably massive profit incentives are on the line—that everyone in key positions of power will act 100% honestly and altruistically? If I hit the nail on the head, you hammered it all the wa
27.
by vokep 5y ago
a) We do not have sufficient data, and threat of sterility is a serious concern which is yet to be ruled out b) Thats your choice. I've never opted for the flu vaccine because the lack of accountability of its efficacy and profit incen
28.
by vokep 5y ago
You're sure those are ICUs full of people in critical condition due to COVID? How many went to the hospital the instant they got COVID despite lack of critical symptoms? I don't think you're trying to be hyperbolic, I think y
29.
by vokep 5y ago
>As a society, the choice is crystal clear: vaccines that do not kill people today The vaccines are killing an alarming number of people today. >versus a virus that demonstrably overwhelms health systems, This is not true. Hospitals w
30.
by vokep 5y ago
This perspective would seem more reasonable if it weren't based on headlines alone. The sort of headlines it's based on, when you dig into how they conclude to those headlines, often are fairly detached. There are cases of wild s

More ›