vnth93

5 ms·

1.
by vnth93 7y ago
I guess it is equivalent in some ways. In modern society we don't really see religion as fundamental to personhood, or perhaps not to the extent of gender. And many would argue that a person do not choose their gender, although since I
2.
by vnth93 7y ago
Apparently the person was concerned that this would allow people to control any narrative they want. For example he suggested that nobody should have to be obligated to acknowledged him as, say, a Christian. I genuinely dont know if this is
3.
by vnth93 7y ago
Sorry but I'm going to have to ask for the basis of your claim here. It is wellknown that autistic people's lack of selfawareness is varying and inconsistent and how much they can overcome this depends heavily on how much help the
4.
by vnth93 7y ago
I'm not aware that practicing radical self-censorship for the sake of conformity is the current standard of social justice, and, as far as I can tell, numerous forms of injustice were at one point or another deemed socially acceptable.
5.
by vnth93 7y ago
But you do to judge what people with any given type of mental health issue can and cannot do.
6.
by vnth93 7y ago
If he had the capacity to comprehend any of this he wouldn't be the sort of person who talked about the Knight of Hot Ladies at work. Unless Garrett somehow turned out to be a some kind of medical expert, his opinion on Stallman is abo
7.
by vnth93 7y ago
If his logic didnt matter, shouldnt he be condemned for only being inappropriate or hostile? Yet it seems that his current reputation among the public at large is that of an actual paedophilia/rape apologist. Whether he actually was or
8.
by vnth93 7y ago
Are people campaigning against moderate use of sugar or the pervasiveness of sugary products? In some way the drug analogy is also true concerning the dosage and manner of which the two were commercialized and not just the reward mechanic.