vlad-roundabout

6 ms·

1.
by vlad-roundabout 8mo ago
Can't you just download content from centralised services as well?
2.
by vlad-roundabout 8mo ago
Next you will say that somehow iMessage isn't social media, but WhatsApp is.
3.
by vlad-roundabout 8mo ago
Then force them to make it less addictive, because they can!
4.
by vlad-roundabout 8mo ago
They aren't, but Gugel and Eple want to keep their duopoly. No, I won't support an app blocking other OSes.
5.
by vlad-roundabout 8mo ago
Right, only for Andretard and iPhonys, ensuring the monopoly will be there to stay.
6.
by vlad-roundabout 8mo ago
How do you do it without harming privacy? How do you do it without nasty attestation that basically bans GNU/Linux? How do you handle children interested in topics (like programming) which only online platforms can sustain well? And al
7.
by vlad-roundabout 8mo ago
The software can't have a price, but the service of maintaining it and adding someone's desired features can.
8.
by vlad-roundabout 8mo ago
A problem is that some Python library with a sole developer who is on the verge of halting maintenance needs your $1 way more than the Linux Foundation.
9.
by vlad-roundabout 2y ago
I agree a Firefox or WebKit browser would be better, but give me one.
10.
by vlad-roundabout 2y ago
Even better than Brave is a "no-name" browser like Ungoogled Chromium made to protect actual privacy, not the interests of some company!
11.
by vlad-roundabout 2y ago
I think shipping Google is fair. It's not forced upon anyone, and much better than collecting data themselves, or advertising their own services, or making proprietary software.
12.
by vlad-roundabout 2y ago
Some fruits of this project have already landed in some browsers: * Popovers: https://open-ui.org/components/popover.research.explainer/ , https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web&#x2F
13.
by vlad-roundabout 2y ago
Yes, one can style them with a userstyle as always.