vinzenzu

4 ms·

1.
by vinzenzu 3mo ago
And here's the link on pi.dev's plugin/package marketplace https://pi.dev/packages/pi-auto-reviewer
2.
Auto mode for pi.dev. An LLM reviews your coding agent's commands(github.com)
1 points by vinzenzu 3mo ago|2 comments
3.
by vinzenzu 3mo ago
Codex and Claude Code have an auto/auto-review mode to let a reviewer LLM check suspect commands your coding agent wants to run. I was annoyed that OpenCode and pi.dev don't support that, so I made this small plugin for the pi (pi
4.
by vinzenzu 4mo ago
API prices of Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google are massively inflated. https://martinalderson.com/posts/no-it-doesnt-cost-anthropic... There's no way that all AI inference providers are colluding and/or all runn
5.
by vinzenzu 4mo ago
Any frameworks that I missed/that you're using? We use NautilusTrader, very happy with it.
6.
by vinzenzu 4mo ago
Leaps and bounds better! I don't think I benchmarked it. But the experience was that it was able to find small details in PDFs, in technical diagrams, and this was really not captured well at all with OCR. In general, OCR I think shoul
7.
20 Algo Trading Frameworks Reviewed and Compared(autotradelab.com)
4 points by vinzenzu 4mo ago|1 comments
8.
by vinzenzu 4mo ago
For a RAG project for a client with a lot of PDFs and Powerpoints with images, I used ColPali a year ago. I see the provider ColiVara is still online but it seems to have fizzled out. Retrieving based on text and then giving the generation
9.
by vinzenzu 4mo ago
Totally agree. I've been using cheap Chinese open-source models via OpenCode Go, and they are faster, cheaper and in my experience arrive at the solution quicker because they are more pragmatic. Yesterday Codex was making a big issue o