vikingly

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by vikingly 2mo ago

   There is no collective opinion needed to interpret the historical use and context of the laws. When Scandinavia entered Schengen it was all Western European countries that explicitly kept Eastern European countries out. Asylums were rare, l
2. 2.▲
   by vikingly 2mo ago

   A lot of it comes through EU laws, which was agreed to with the assumption of a different population mix in the Schengen free flow of people. Same with migrants brought in through exploited asylum laws which again assumed small numbers from
3. 3.▲
   by vikingly 2mo ago

   What makes Scandinavians responsible for judging merit of individuals in or even allowing a specific group in? All border control is group based. It’s our country and we have no obligation to let anyone in, especially a group that culturall
4. 4.▲
   by vikingly 2mo ago

   The question asked in Scandinavia is if a migrant group is a net benefit to our ability to have group solidarity, while high skill individuals are judged on individual merit. These are two very different categories, and Scandinavians do not
5. 5.▲
   by vikingly 2mo ago

   I am from Scandinavia. We call ourselves socialist.
6. 6.▲
   by vikingly 2mo ago

   The blogpost has the attitude problem of virtue signaling about decisions that has zero cost to themselves, about a communal kin based socialist society them know little about. Normal working families with kids live next to these parks and