Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
vena
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
1.
▲
by
vena
4mo ago
it uses MQTT, FTP, and RTSP. the key and serial are the credentials.
2.
▲
by
vena
4y ago
oh good, didn’t know if it would do that/force a cache invalidation for clients
3.
▲
by
vena
4y ago
did you fully log out/in or just lock/unlock? iirc locking with BW doesn’t do what one might expect wrt encryption state.
4.
▲
by
vena
4y ago
this is a proposed ban for the US.
5.
▲
by
vena
4y ago
the US doesn’t really import natgas.
6.
▲
by
vena
7y ago
They're a lot more ubiquitous than some burner's art projects. While I wouldn't necessarily fret over a light switch crashing, expressif chips are popping up in home security products like SimpliSafe. Likely safe in a home fr
7.
▲
by
vena
13y ago
i can't help but read this as "node-e-o's"
8.
▲
by
vena
14y ago
i just don't understand why they named the OS after the API it's restricted to, something consumers will never encounter. the end result of WinRT is just Metro, something marketable and relatable. why the hell don't you just call it Windo
9.
▲
by
vena
14y ago
fwiw, you don't need to turn it off to install unsigned apps, it can be overridden on a case-by-case basis by right clicking the app and opening it there. you are never prompted again for that app. i can see the argument for "burying" this
10.
▲
by
vena
15y ago
the same issue is present in the current Firefox Aurora build.
11.
▲
by
vena
15y ago
> Can you tell why the EU requires Windows to display a browser selection box on first boot to Europeans, but is okay with iOS totally BANNING the use of non-Safari browser engines? Because the restrictions placed on Microsoft were a re
12.
▲
by
vena
15y ago
Samsung is the factory contractor for the A5, Apple designed it and Apple owns it outright. Foxconn assembles Apple products and provides some off-the-shelf parts. Apple does not levy such licensing restrictions against another company's
13.
▲
by
vena
15y ago
It very much changes the issue. That is not an OS developer requiring third-party hardware OEMs prevent loading another OS as part of their licensing agreement. This is fairly specific anti-competitive behaviour, it's not an issue of locki
14.
▲
by
vena
15y ago
They're not locked down by Google.
15.
▲
by
vena
15y ago
Apple produces their own hardware, and the various locked Android devices are not being locked down by Google.
16.
▲
by
vena
15y ago
appcelerator titanium, i'd guess - http://www.appcelerator.com/
17.
▲
by
vena
15y ago
i don't really see the point. i can't imagine the transfer protocol matters. otherwise, putting ads that have less capability than web streams (because they're contained in a local file) seems like a red herring. content companies have t
18.
▲
by
vena
15y ago
"These stats are based on the add-ons hosted with AMO only, and don’t include personas and add-ons bundled with other software."
19.
▲
by
vena
16y ago
When you see the breaks, the three little black reveals that interrupt the band, in photographs, you could be forgiven for assuming you're seeing three separate strips of metal with gaps in between; but in fact it's all one piece. from th
20.
▲
by
vena
16y ago
It's the same way Google Chrome extensions are built, isn't it? I just assumed this is Apple blessing what's really just a part of WebKit...
21.
▲
by
vena
16y ago
Can anyone give any opinions on this vs Appcelerator?
22.
▲
by
vena
16y ago
Why is it Google's responsibility to keep PR news wires in business?
23.
▲
by
vena
17y ago
so, can those of us writing in interpreted languages still fight about this?
24.
▲
by
vena
17y ago
the pricing issue is very interesting, but there's not a lot of meat to the story here. i'd like to see the developer find a way to interview the people who bought the increasingly pricey app and try to actually get some data to go with th
25.
▲
by
vena
17y ago
would they really need such a thing? street lights tend to point downwards, don't they?
26.
▲
by
vena
17y ago
I've always found that browser stats matter most for the site they belong to.
27.
▲
by
vena
17y ago
And Einstein would possibly have agreed with that to some extent, as evidenced by his reply in 1936 to the rejection of the only paper of his ever even subject to peer review, even then a new concept in fields unrelated to medicine. This h
28.
▲
by
vena
17y ago
Which is about 1/10th of what your post is implying. You might want to read something deeper than a wikipedia summary.
29.
▲
by
vena
17y ago
I really don't think you should take your understanding of Einstein's early career from Yahoo Serious movies.
30.
▲
by
vena
17y ago
i suppose the author recently read The Pragmatic Programmer? as with the same argument presented in that book, i have a little trouble with this since i've been under the impression the broken windows hypothesis was discredited...
More ›