vehementi

5 ms·

1.
by vehementi 4mo ago
To an extent it can help reduce wasteful steps. But there's nothing AI can do that can make it less irresponsible to reduce soak times, stagger the release across many environments, etc.
2.
by vehementi 5mo ago
Nothing you wrote seems to support what you said at the start there. Why is the importance of code quality decreasing?
3.
by vehementi 6mo ago
Is the DC one of the availability zones of an AWS region?
4.
by vehementi 7mo ago
Played a run through, would be nice to be able to play more than 1 puzzle (if there's nobody to queue with quickly in multiplayer). Maybe let me play yesterday's puzzle or something, especially if I just figured out the ropes?
5.
by vehementi 7mo ago
I read this and came away a bit sheepish not really grasping the significance of extreme focus on PRNG and entropy for basic things. Glad to see the rest of the comments agreeing. "What every experimenter must know"...
6.
by vehementi 11mo ago
Mere hours into the incident, before there's any RCA, someone rushes to discredit themselves with a simplistic explanation
7.
by vehementi 11mo ago
Check out Defense in Depth as a security concept
8.
by vehementi 1y ago
Be that as it may, it's missing the illogical point the other person raised. If your $300 painting was worth $10k when it got stolen from you, but 7 years later the market value is $1M, you don't say "I was robbed of a millio
9.
by vehementi 1y ago
Finally we can talk to the bomb dudes in Serious Sam
10.
by vehementi 1y ago
Yes, that is how I read it as well. Email was just for fun, and the code came by a different channel (of course). The email the scammer sent wouldn't contain a code they can use to take over his account (of course).
11.
by vehementi 1y ago
On obvious spoofs I see "legal@gmail.com <via scamdude@askjdfaskldfj.net>". I think he means that it didn't indicate the latter. And if gmail phone app didn't fail to display headers he could have looked
12.
by vehementi 1y ago
Your analogy is different. They bought for X, then when it was stolen it was worth 80k, and at this random time today, it's worth $120k and he's saying he lost $120k.
13.
by vehementi 1y ago
> Who knows what hell can be unleashed on one's emotions nowadays with AI This is key. I would "never" fall for a scam like this. But who knows for sure? I would also never cheat on my partner, but can I say with 100% cert
14.
by vehementi 1y ago
It's honestly irresponsible to pick up phone calls at this point. Phishers are really good, and every human has some weakness, so you can't guarantee you wouldn't fall for something -- perhaps one day a new vulnerability co
15.
by vehementi 1y ago
They're not saying they can't get the headers, the point is that if you're using iOS you don't have access to the headers to validate
16.
by vehementi 1y ago
Justifiable in a vacuum, but the end result is grandma knows "sometimes it's OK to give the code to the person on the phone"
17.
by vehementi 2y ago
> It's the only messaging app where messages are stored on the cloud Unreal. Please share how you came to this world view.
18.
by vehementi 2y ago
Jesus it even mentions Instagram Threads in it
19.
by vehementi 2y ago
Yes, they don't actually answer the question of how safe SF is. They say that some areas are more safe than others. Is the worst area in SF unsafe at all , or are the absolute numbers (and per capita) actually low? How unsafe? Who sho
20.
by vehementi 2y ago
Not to go all Godwin but a lot of people have the same reaction to news about Trump -- for some reason, people see the need to lie about and misrepresent Trump. "If he's so bad, surely people could just list off his crimes without
21.
by vehementi 2y ago
I wonder why this guy has a plug for that home doctor book which looks reeeeally sketchy. I went looking for reviews of it and reddit is filled by spam from just one reddit user
22.
by vehementi 2y ago
I too am intensely distrustful of anyone expressing an opinion in more than a few paragraphs
23.
by vehementi 2y ago
I am kinda tiring of seeing this rationalization. Don't you see, it's on the company to fire you if your productivity is low! Feel free to do nothing or as little as possible! That's such trash. If you're in software and
24.
by vehementi 2y ago
??? that's not the zig they are referring to. They mean by firing 30, 40, 50, or 60 rockets in a relaxing match of Quake, they'll de-stress
25.
by vehementi 2y ago
I'm on a non-tech-related Vancouver discord server, and I can name 10 people on there who work in tech and actively try to do the least they can get away with at jobs, or work multiple jobs secretly, etc. and not one of them complains
26.
by vehementi 2y ago
All software development? You can work at 25% pace and get away with it at most places. Sandbag, attend lots of meetings, be "blocked" by things often, etc. It's not about literally producing nothing, it's about working
27.
by vehementi 2y ago
Not the same thing and when phenomena are studied they often get additional names
28.
by vehementi 2y ago
> sig myself out What is meant by this?
29.
by vehementi 2y ago
I actively treasure my shower thoughts time and have been thinking of doing more of that. One issue is that if I'm in a bad mood, stressed, annoyed at some stupid coworker, etc. my mind will wander in that useless area instead of in th
30.
by vehementi 3y ago
What do you mean by that?

More ›