vanillameow

5 ms·

1.
by vanillameow 3mo ago
The tagline is literally "No AI" but this is a clearly Claude-designed website and you say you use AI for moderation, so what does the "No AI" even refer to? That the people you talk to aren't AI? What reason do I h
2.
by vanillameow 3mo ago
According to GFN, my ping is somewhere between ~20-25. I can see how it would be playable for the casual audience, but as someone who grew up on native gaming, it's not really playable to me for anything that's not turn based. It&
3.
by vanillameow 3mo ago
I really enjoy the prose of this article. The writing breaks down concepts in a very easily understandable way. Thank you for posting, will definitely finish this one later!
4.
by vanillameow 4mo ago
I mean it's not as offensive as a lot of other vibe-coded "products", but it's just kind of a waste of everyone's time; there's no ingenuity in the presentation (it suffers from the same emoji-feature-box-small
5.
by vanillameow 4mo ago
The components heavily give Claude Code vibes. I use CC to build internal tools and, given free reign over the design, this exactly what it will produce. Won't comment on the writing other than that the punchlines do feel a bit pretent
6.
by vanillameow 5mo ago
Because Opus is kind of degrading lately, I said "fuck it" and made a new OAI account and used the month free trial. I put one query into ChatGPT using 5.5 thinking - the frustrating thing was that it did put more effort into gett
7.
by vanillameow 5mo ago
I mean, sentiment in this thread (and the neighboring Opus 4.7 one) are overwhelmingly negative this time around. That comment prob would have made more sense around 4.5/4.6. That said, until models produce verifiably correct work (whi
8.
by vanillameow 5mo ago
I think Opus is just an expensive model on API, especially without context management. A single message with near full context (I think this was still on 250k as well) costs like 1$ or something like that iirc. Imo this is the premium I pay
9.
by vanillameow 5mo ago
Nah I get you, but for me personally, I do use CC a ton. It's building me so many useful internal tools right now, and deep research is also bootstrapping me into some new hobbies etc. I think I'm kind of in a rare-ish (maybe not
10.
by vanillameow 5mo ago
I ran this just now and for a small web-app I built I used over $50 in a single day. This was using superpowers plugin and almost exclusively coordinating through Opus. Could I get by with 100$ a month without the subscription? Maybe, but I
11.
by vanillameow 6mo ago
1. In reality most people simply do not do this, and frankly it's exhausting to be expected to always assume goodwill in a setting that is full of pure vanity. 2. There's a difference between technical documentation, which AI can
12.
by vanillameow 6mo ago
Genuine question - your README is full of em-dashes, emojis, feature squares and ASCII diagrams - none of which are present in your pre-AI era projects. Why do you expect a potential userbase to care to read something you didn't even c
13.
by vanillameow 6mo ago
If you need to author a lot of emails with LLM you should be rethinking your business strategy tbh
14.
by vanillameow 6mo ago
I use mainly Opus 4.6. I did the same thing and created a skill for summarizing a troubleshooting conversation. It works decently, as long as my own input in the troubleshooting is minimal. i.e. dangerously-skip-permissions. As soon as I ne
15.
by vanillameow 6mo ago
I'm surprised to see this getting so much positive reception. In my experience AI is still really bad with documenting the exact steps it took, much more so when those are dependent on its environment, and once there's a human in
16.
by vanillameow 6mo ago
I am not sure how I feel about all these hype-driven tools honestly, especially considering they are super janky since probably rushed out with Claude Code. It reminds me that I don't really like Anthropic as a company, I just like Cla
17.
by vanillameow 6mo ago
Not incorrect, but it honestly borders on grifting a lot of the time imo. At least it's a spectrum. If you are supercharging your existing technical and domain knowledge, and actually caring about the security of your customers while d
18.
by vanillameow 6mo ago
> Also, services based SAAS especially B2B will not die, because a tyre shop won't have the time to write/debug/host it's own solution and will not want to depend to a single contractor who can disappear for a vacatio
19.
by vanillameow 6mo ago
...what is your actual point? I'm pretty sure none of the shit I read on LinkedIn is making "philosophical ideas accessible to the masses", it's churned out 20x regurgitated self-promotional material. Is this a bot post?
20.
by vanillameow 6mo ago
So I've seen. It's just the LinkedIn one is what they advertised. Speaks to the fact that it's probably some slopcoded thing, which I'd usually get mildly upset about but who can muster the effort in this economy. I thin
21.
by vanillameow 6mo ago
This LinkedIn translator was a genius move by Kagi, honestly. A lot of people are incredibly tired not only of AI(-adjacent) writing, but overall of people with a stick up their ass thinking they're this generation's Aristotle. Ha
22.
by vanillameow 6mo ago
I can't help but feel a little bit of ... pity for a lot of the people who call themselves "entrepreneurs" in this survey? "I live hand to mouth, zero savings. If I use AI smarter, it may help me craft solutions to that
23.
by vanillameow 6mo ago
I've picked up reading again over the last year or so! Maybe, if anything, that is why I feel so angry. Writing and reading are how we communicate thoughts and ideas between people, humans, at scale. A grand fantasy novel evokes a th
24.
by vanillameow 6mo ago
Can we stop softening the blow? This isn't "drafted with at least major AI help", it's just straight up AI slop writing. Let's call a spade a spade. I have yet to meet anyone claiming they "write with AI help b
25.
by vanillameow 6mo ago
Tiring. Internet in 2026 is LLMs reporting on LLMs pen-testing LLM-generated software.
26.
by vanillameow 6mo ago
> If the primary appeal of your VR universe is that your avatar can be an anthropomorphic banana, an anime girl, a furry, a giant penis with legs - that's never going to become a 300-million-user platform. I mean the inherent appeal
27.
by vanillameow 6mo ago
>Is there realistically any way to CAPTCHA anymore? Talking to someone in real life. Of course that's taking the piss, but realistically that is sort of the answer: Having access to a side-channel through which you can identify that
28.
by vanillameow 6mo ago
Considering the topic of this article I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt, but to be honest - if you're not writing your articles with LLMs, you should strongly consider changing your writing style. I peeked some of your other
29.
by vanillameow 7mo ago
Regardless, I think if you are thinking purely from a ruthless business standpoint then standing up to the DoD was an incredibly ill-advised move. It's basically free financial and technological backing at the cost of ethics. Additiona
30.
by vanillameow 7mo ago
This is a project where I actually kind of like the idea, but the implementation looks incredibly soulless.

More ›