valtih1978

5 ms·

1.
by valtih1978 13y ago
> For the time being, we don't have the infrastructure to support solely public transportation, so in the meantime it is reasonable to use electric vehicles. You put everything upside down. You do not have the efficient infrastructu
2.
by valtih1978 13y ago
What?
3.
by valtih1978 13y ago
Wow you reading Yergin's "The Prize", which won the Pulitzer Prize award and think that you know everything about the oil. You is actually an idiot. I can recommed you Jarred Diamond, http://en.wikipedia.org/w
4.
by valtih1978 13y ago
How does it make coal or atomic energy more efficient than oil? You get electricity by burning them. When you burn either coal or oil, you loose 70% of energy. Then, you loose delivering the electric power and charging the accumulators. Fin
5.
by valtih1978 13y ago
> It goes into manufacturing. That is a good manipulation. I do not think that this is a joke becaus you must know that the major manufacturer is the China yet the major oil conumers are Europe and US, http://en.wikipedia.org&
6.
by valtih1978 13y ago
> A good amount of the oil does go into gadgets. http://www.thedailygreen.com/cm/thedailygreen/images/product... 90% is fuel. Thanks for making me an idiot. You should add that burning that oil in your car
7.
by valtih1978 13y ago
> We would not live in our current modern age without oil really? Do you mean that I am an idiot who does not undestand this? > Exxon has over 1,000 PhDs on staff. Really? Can I prove that 1+1 = 3 based on that?
8.
by valtih1978 13y ago
More efficient? Are you on drugs?
9.
by valtih1978 13y ago
The oil does not go into gadgets. All the oil goes into your car, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPS1y81b1Bw
10.
by valtih1978 13y ago
When you are telling truth it is better to make it a joke. But, truth is the best joke itself, sometimes.
11.
by valtih1978 13y ago
I had to come up with the aspect of sustainablity because it is of utmost importantance in the postoil we have entered whereas it remains outside the mainstream, as opposed with the topic (the electric car), which are deceptevly sold as a s
12.
by valtih1978 13y ago
You is a fascist propaganda. At first, Poland was eager to sign the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German–Polish_Non-Aggression_P... in 1934 -- watch the photo (Hitler is in power since 1933). June 1939 absolutely nazi
13.
by valtih1978 13y ago
> There's no doubt about the documents that they released to the Poles confirming the Soviet orders? Are you so brainwashed that you cannot even read? How there cannot be doubt after http://katynmassakern.blogspot.com&#x2
14.
by valtih1978 13y ago
Do you mean that the attack of the Soviets by Poland in 1920, when the Western Ukrane was seized by polish fascists, and dividing the Chekoslovakia with Hitler in 1938, inflaming the WWII, was the act of piece? Or, you just deny these facts
15.
by valtih1978 13y ago
Electric Cars Will Help to Kill the Planet https://stephenrees.wordpress.com/2014/02/05/electric-cars-w... I am very in consent with the outrage that William Rees dares to disseminate http://www.yo
16.
by valtih1978 13y ago
Look for manufacturing consent and Noam Chomsky to understand why the facts that I tell seem outlandish to you. He speaks right about indoctrination, the indoctrination that turns white into black and vice-versa. It says about "landown
17.
by valtih1978 13y ago
I expected when you come up with this piece of Goebbels propaganda in order to justify your nazi wars. The very article you refer confirms that we have a piece of Goebbels propaganda. The polish officers, arrested by Soviet Union, have noth
18.
by valtih1978 13y ago
In 1939 SU "invated the Poland" is a complete nazi nonsense. SU has invateded its own territory, siezed earlier by the fascist Poland, after the polish government ceased to exist. So, it is hard to tell what you are talking about
19.
by valtih1978 13y ago
The nazi lesson is more important in the face of processes which happens today, on our eyes in Poland, in Baltic states and Ukrane (do you know that Nazi penetrate the official power in Ukrane, what would western countires do if somebody se
20.
by valtih1978 13y ago
The fact that you can explain a doctrine does not render the criticism of that doctrine incorrect. Indecent attack on critique means that you use all means to defend a flawed doctrine, which implies you is a proponent of that flawed doctrin
21.
by valtih1978 13y ago
We have a first libertarian to manipulate here. He even does not bother to read adn understand the basic idea exposed by the article. He thinks that we are children and keeps selling us the fraud.
22.
by valtih1978 13y ago
It is not something new. All we know the free market mantra that _too big_ companies are not viable. I also remember that Carl Sagan's "Cosmos" central point was that it is the technology that dramatically reduces the probabi