valleyer

16 ms·

1.
by valleyer 3d ago
Not in vi. :)
2.
by valleyer 4d ago
At least in the US, police don't enforce terms of service of private corporations. That's a civil matter, enforced by filing a lawsuit.
3.
by valleyer 6d ago
Keep in mind there may be a significant Pepsi Challenge effect at play here.
4.
by valleyer 7d ago
Yes, I too remember when Shaq starred in this commercial. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Af0gtsjfy7E
5.
by valleyer 7d ago
Less space than a Nomad? Lame?
6.
by valleyer 8d ago
Funny. But... paper covers rock.
7.
by valleyer 11d ago
I'm not an expert, but... might this indicate the need for "sub-models", meant to be invoked by the general model to write good prose for it? Those sub-models would not be RLed on code (or any algorithmic-feedback tasks that
8.
by valleyer 12d ago
Prior art: the evil bit https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc3514
9.
by valleyer 12d ago
During training, certain tokens are more likely to lead to a lower loss function value, which is how you "win" the game of LLM output.
10.
by valleyer 12d ago
It could be added to context only on the inference server, with the model heavily instructed not to repeat its contents. Not foolproof, obviously.
11.
by valleyer 13d ago
"Domino effect" would probably be the more relevant named phenomenon there.
12.
by valleyer 17d ago
Interesting. I don't remember my crossover cables being marked that way; you had to read the dot-matrix printing along the side to know. Color would have been way more handy.
13.
by valleyer 17d ago
One of the strawiest strawmen I've seen in quite some time.
14.
by valleyer 19d ago
At least historically, it actually did run its own entire userspace, including daemons (all the way to launchd, IIRC), etc. All compiled for Intel, back in the day. Shared the kernel though. Many of the nominally shared system pieces betw
15.
by valleyer 19d ago
It is possible for both Trump and Biden to be wrong about something.
16.
by valleyer 19d ago
If punching random people on the street is so obviously bad, then why do people fight back when I do it?
17.
by valleyer 20d ago
Anthropic would estimate (and provide justification of) how much lost income (and perhaps brand equity, opportunity cost, etc.) it suffered as a result of the government's actions, and the judge would consider it and decide.
18.
by valleyer 21d ago
I agree. I just thought it was funny that someone was pointing out the legal unaccountability of an AI in this context.
19.
by valleyer 21d ago
Good point. CEOs of companies are often held personally accountable for corporate malfeasance by "the current legal framework".
20.
by valleyer 21d ago
Even if it's communication/announcements from the government ? I too am constantly frustrated that official communications from governments happen on Twitter or Facebook.
21.
by valleyer 21d ago
Certainly. But in the current social environment, being seen as (mildly) careless is less bad than being seen as someone who lets an LLM write prose for them.
22.
by valleyer 25d ago
"Reality has a well-known liberal bias."
23.
by valleyer 25d ago
The U.S. constitution does not say that. Where are you getting that from? It does say that the president cannot pardon an impeachment, but that's not the same thing at all.
24.
by valleyer 25d ago
Hey, good for you for following through.
25.
by valleyer 28d ago
That's not generally how the English language works. We say "an SoC" but "a system-on-chip".
26.
by valleyer 1mo ago
It could absolutely have been in an iMac's wireless keyboard; witness the "Sidecar" macOS feature that allows use of an iPad as an external display for a Mac.
27.
by valleyer 1mo ago
Oy, "the solve".
28.
by valleyer 1mo ago
That's what zsh's INC_APPEND_HISTORY (mentioned in TFA) avoids. Bash may have an equivalent.
29.
by valleyer 1mo ago
If the author is here, do yourself a favor and rewrite the app's labels from Claudese to English. "what the shape does not decide: Pitch is size and tension; fade is material and air. Neither is in the outline, so both are yours.&
30.
by valleyer 1mo ago
English, motherfucker. Does Claude speak it?

More ›