Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
vadimberman
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
Show HN: Translate Search Query for Google
(tisane.ai)
1 points
by
vadimberman
4y ago
|
0 comments
2.
▲
by
vadimberman
8y ago
Thank you! I will need the entire client code though. Let's switch to email - the one you logged on with is OK, right? EDIT: sent.
3.
▲
by
vadimberman
8y ago
Thanks, Web64. What was the issue? Any error messages or you just didn't get the output you wanted? I imagine you're interested in Norwegian? EDIT: I forgot to mention that you don't need to code to test-drive. You can simply
4.
▲
Show HN: API to detect abusive content in 27 languages
5 points
by
vadimberman
8y ago
|
4 comments
5.
▲
by
vadimberman
8y ago
> However, you've concluded that because the author described a problem with capitalism but not the equivalent problem with communism, the author must be a marxist. How? Why? Where? I am merely saying that since the opposing ideolog
6.
▲
by
vadimberman
8y ago
It could be possible theoretically if not the context of the article. "We are asked to imagine" and so on. But even if it were the case, the fact that the same idea was commonplace in the USSR means that it's not inherently c
7.
▲
by
vadimberman
8y ago
I absolutely agree. Plus, the meaningfulness of the task sometimes is beyond economic; many people code in crazy hours because they love the job. I doubt it was the same with miners 500 years ago. But all these nuances aren't even look
8.
▲
by
vadimberman
8y ago
> your apparent argument that anyone criticising capitalism can only be a Soviet-era state-supporting "communist" That would be a highly creative way of summarising my post. My problem with the paper was that it started what wa
9.
▲
by
vadimberman
8y ago
It's wonderful that there is someone with mind as unclouded by propaganda to enlighten me and improve my limited world view. Did you find any figures or arguments in the original paper that I overlooked? Like, Chinese peasants, German
10.
▲
by
vadimberman
8y ago
Ugh. The paper reeks of political agenda. The very first sentence is: > One of capitalism's most durable myths is that it has reduced human toil. What about the Communism? Why would they spread this durable myth? Because I remembe
11.
▲
by
vadimberman
8y ago
There's RNA and possibly others even on this planet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3331698/
12.
▲
by
vadimberman
8y ago
It depends on the kind of panspermia. If it's about generic organic molecules then the DNA is a local construct. If it's about microorganisms, then it's different.
13.
▲
by
vadimberman
8y ago
> Ata’s bones contain DNA that not only shows she was human The fact that there's a DNA already means it's not an alien, doesn't it? Having a life form with the same uber-complex chain of nucleotides as the life on earth d
14.
▲
by
vadimberman
8y ago
Sounds like a part publicity (NYT was invited), part employment fair for the Bezos' ventures. He can talk to the candidates, observe how they behave, and at the same time intrigue them with the prospects of working for him. Amazingly,
15.
▲
by
vadimberman
8y ago
In addition to that, even if we were limited to the "last moment", there was about half a second or a second time to react. Correct me if I'm wrong, but that should be enough for the car to at least try something. Isn't
16.
▲
by
vadimberman
8y ago
And today they circulate articles bragging with the number of supercomputers. It's the same as publicly listed companies increase headcount to look like they are thriving ("X is profitable and hiring"). Microsoft, for example
17.
▲
by
vadimberman
8y ago
> Having complicated science underlying a product certainly doesn't excuse a company from producing products that people want. That's not the biggest obstacle, actually. The biggest obstacle that the sales strategy has no case
18.
▲
by
vadimberman
8y ago
Agree, and given the standard "liquidity preference", the founders are likely to net $0, except for the Google bonuses for the engineering (Jack Barker-like Rosenthal is not likely to stick there). It's sad, really. It's
19.
▲
by
vadimberman
9y ago
Unfortunately, very plausible. It's ridiculous how much neat stuff is buried by corporate lawyers "mitigating" a danger as probable as a meteorite strike.
20.
▲
by
vadimberman
9y ago
That sounds plausible but they do collaborate with the .NET open-sourcing efforts, that could be an opportunity for them to test new waters.
21.
▲
by
vadimberman
9y ago
I remember early reports about self-driving experiments saying that some of the issues where because the cars were driving at the speed limit, which is usually not the case in the US with the human drivers. Maybe they decided to change it.
22.
▲
by
vadimberman
9y ago
Concerning another dead mobile OS, I never understood why Microsoft did not try to spin off or open-source their mobile effort. In fact, the rationale for killing it seems an example of corporate waste: it had user base in double-digits in
23.
▲
by
vadimberman
9y ago
> By 2020, China’s AI industry will be “in line” with the most advanced countries, with a core AI industry gross output exceeding RMB 150 billion (USD 22.5 billion) and AI-related industry gross output exceeding RMB 1 trillion (USD 150.
24.
▲
by
vadimberman
9y ago
I wonder how many people can pinpoint where the boundary between the two communities lies. What does this division help to achieve? The two communities are in exactly the same format.
25.
▲
by
vadimberman
9y ago
> And .. I downvoted you. I hope it will sting. I can't see whether I was downvoted but I see that the net result is very positive. But I'll take your word on that. Perhaps your view is not shared as widely? > People giving
26.
▲
by
vadimberman
9y ago
> It’s like the high karma answerers are exactly the subset of the site that you want seeing and answering your question because the site supports the idea that they are good at doing that, but they’re always reflected as some kind of ty
27.
▲
by
vadimberman
9y ago
> It's nice that in a discussion that is in part about being nice you call someone that downvoted you an idiot. I call them an idiot because they were nitpicking on a question that was asking for help well within the already Procrus
28.
▲
by
vadimberman
9y ago
OK, thank you. For these guys the blogging seems nearly a full-time job though. I wonder if it's realistic to get there with a small slice of time.
29.
▲
by
vadimberman
9y ago
> A blog that makes you a thought leader I keep hearing that, but... Has anyone here actually seen it working? Not nitpicking, just looking for actual examples to learn from.
30.
▲
by
vadimberman
9y ago
I do hope that Stack Overflow will become usable again. In my opinion, the problem is mostly the answerers. I went all the way from a simple coder to management, and now I'm doing both, running my second startup. I talk to people of di
More ›