ux-app

7 ms·

1.
by ux-app 2y ago
I'm, just taking a guess here, I don't have any prompts on had, but imagine that ChatGPT is pretty "woke" (fk I hate that term). It's unlikely to take the current US administration's position on gender politics
2.
by ux-app 2y ago
Yep, it's the outline around text that won you the client.
3.
by ux-app 2y ago
Stretching the timeline to 30 years doesn't make the achievement any less impressive.
4.
by ux-app 2y ago
Why do some people gloat about moving goalposts around? 15 years ago self driving of any sort was pure fantasy, yet here we are. They'll release a version that can drive in poor weather and you'll complain that it can't drive
5.
by ux-app 2y ago
In a world where openAI exists, it really does require an almost breathtaking lack of imagination to be a skeptic.
6.
by ux-app 2y ago
>This is the polar opposite of BotW’s design thesis and I hate you for tainting it. LOL, calm down mate. Fwiw, I've read your back and forth with the GP and I'm much more excited with their vision than yours. Anyone with any im
7.
by ux-app 3y ago
>All it's doing is noticing that makes no sense and saying so. How could it not recognize it? you say that like it's the simplest thing in the world. it really amazes me how quickly people acclimate to this mind-blowing tech.
8.
by ux-app 3y ago
>This will come from the capitalist system, businesses will be driving the obsolescence of humans, what's the point of owning the factories if there is no one to buy the crap you produce? they need us more than we need them, at leas
9.
by ux-app 3y ago
>Why is consciousness computation? if there is no duality, then what else can it be? > there are entire philosophical movements that have developed fascinating accounts of consciousness that are far from strict materialism philosopher
10.
by ux-app 3y ago
people generally get tired of life because their body is failing. I'm sure you could find exceptions where people were just ... bored ... and ready to die, but this would be the extreme minority. >There's a finite amount of ...
11.
by ux-app 3y ago
>changing the control scheme Controllers use analog input for the sticks. I guess you could create a system which uses a dead zone where the player "signals" their intention by partially moving the stick in their desired direct
12.
by ux-app 3y ago
>I guess the problem there is pretty fundamental yes absolutely, you can't have both realism and snappy response times.
13.
by ux-app 3y ago
It's always a tradeoff between responsive movement and realistic movement. RDR2 has very realistic animations, with the tradeoff being slightly "floaty" controls. Personally I prefer snappy movement i.e. when I press left the
14.
by ux-app 3y ago
lol, what a fantastically obscure game to choose!
15.
by ux-app 3y ago
>could AI generated music ever replace Rancid or Junior Kimbrough or Fela Kuti? AI is ok, but it will never .... until it does, and then the goalposts will move. the only logical endgame that I can see is AI replacing all human endeavo
16.
by ux-app 3y ago
>the answer to the second is trivially Yes, regardless of the value of X then don't do it?
17.
by ux-app 3y ago
>suburbs are probably the worst of both worlds hit the nail on the head right there.
18.
by ux-app 3y ago
that's a lot of what ifs. we don't live in the 50s any more. My wife and I were living together for 8 years before we got married. That sure would have been one doozy of a long con if she turned around and suddenly became a totall
19.
by ux-app 3y ago
ehh, it's a choice to buy into any of that bullshit. we eloped $3,000km away to the tropics to get married. it was more of a holiday with a wedding day thrown in. we loosely, no expectations, invited a few friends and family and were p
20.
by ux-app 3y ago
>No need to risk half of my current assets and future income life is risk. marriage is a great way to de-risk many aspects of your life. 2x income for only 1.3x increased expenses. Easier debt/mortgage access. Support (financial&#x2
21.
by ux-app 3y ago
>That's one data point that I have observed. As with many things genetics plays a big part. I neglected going to the dentist for 15 years and take just ok care of my teeth (brush at least once per day, don't floss). I was expec
22.
by ux-app 3y ago
that's pedantic. switch 2 years to 5 years and the point still stands.
23.
by ux-app 3y ago
>They're still terrible at logical reasoning. 2 years ago a machine that understands natural language and is capable of any arbitrary, free-form logic or problem solving was pure science fiction. I'm baffled by this kind of d
24.
by ux-app 3y ago
>I often wonder if the filter, is more to hide its true capabilities. right now we're all sharing a slice of GPT. I wouldn't be at all surprised if there's some uber GPT (which requires a lot more processing per response)
25.
by ux-app 3y ago
>Maybe it'll turn out to be a distinction that doesn't matter but I personally still think we're a ways away from an actual AGI. if you had described GPT to me 2 years ago I would have said no way, we're still a long
26.
by ux-app 3y ago
>Could you really be confident you understood how it worked by just running experiments on it as a black box the human brain is a black box, we can certainly learn a lot about it by prodding and poking it. >Things look like magic espe
27.
by ux-app 3y ago
>What the paper actually shows is that even intelligent people have a bias towards perceiving patterns in randomness I'm not saying that you're wrong, but... you'd have to provide a more rigorous rebuttal to be taken serio
28.
by ux-app 3y ago
one of the best comments I've read on this topic. you got me with your prompt injection :)
29.
by ux-app 3y ago
>But, as of right now, LLMs can't generate new knowledge my bar for tech singularity is an AI that can clean a toilet. GPT's language model is already sophisticated enough to "understand" this instruction. It's m
30.
by ux-app 3y ago
>But it can’t make novel discoveries like humans. in my 42 years on this planet I don't think i've made any novel discoveries.

More ›