Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
urig
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
urig
3mo ago
Obvs
2.
▲
by
urig
3mo ago
100% agree. It's as if you read the first sentence out of my mind. Thanks.
3.
▲
by
urig
3mo ago
It's only next generation? Anthropic has frontier models! lol
4.
▲
by
urig
3mo ago
He's right. You don't have to cheat to become a billionaire. Stepping on everybody else's throats is a legit part of the capitalist playbook. No cheating involved.
5.
▲
by
urig
4mo ago
Don't build a product tour. It is useless friction. Instead, build your UI to be good,simple, obvious. That's it. That's the tweet.
6.
▲
by
urig
5mo ago
+/- 1 day of nuclear testing because these are old records so dates and times reported might be inaccurate.
7.
▲
by
urig
5mo ago
You don't have to use the most recent bleeding edge model to succeed. A local FOSS coding agent coupled with a reasonably priced LLM could yield the optimal ROI.
8.
▲
by
urig
6mo ago
The tracking described is extremely invasive. You say you are not endorsing it but you are certainly normalizing it. This is unacceptable. The people behind this URL are trying to hold Microsoft accountable. The power to them.
9.
▲
by
urig
6mo ago
As an Israeli, this is an inexcusable crime by IDF soldiers. Appallingly, I expect them to receive no punishment. My country's government is criminally racist.
10.
▲
by
urig
6mo ago
Lots and lots of CPUs pooled. Faster more efficient power RAM accessible to both GPU and CPU. IIUC.
11.
▲
by
urig
6mo ago
What the heck is agentic inference and how is it supposed to be different from LLM inference? That's a rhetorical question. Screw marketing and screw hype.
12.
▲
by
urig
8mo ago
No, we just outsourced car maintenance to professional shop services. Both because mechanical aspects have become reliable enough to last a year without maintenance and because electronic/computer aspects are mind-bogglingly complicate
13.
▲
by
urig
9mo ago
Lost me right about in the middle when he started chirping AI AI AI like a parrot. AI and trust do not go hand in hand. Focus on privacy, transparency and simplicity because instead. Good luck.
14.
▲
by
urig
9mo ago
That's just irresponsible advice. There is so little actual evidence of this technology being able to produce high quality maintainable code that asking us to trust it blindly is borderline snake-oil peddling.
15.
▲
by
urig
10mo ago
Long, interesting, and doesn't actually give you a practical way to spot counterfeit. Click-bait.
16.
▲
by
urig
10mo ago
Bottom line: impressive optics, zero impact for this technology on global warming, it's a distraction.
17.
▲
ShipGoo001: Scientists discover new life aboard Great Lakes research vessel
(news.d.umn.edu)
1 points
by
urig
1y ago
|
1 comments
18.
▲
by
urig
1y ago
University of Minnesota Duluth: "Routine maintenance leads to unexpected microbial discovery in “ship goo” on the R/V Blue Heron's rudder shaft."
19.
▲
by
urig
1y ago
Central to this article, the author asks: "What if you just... removed the AI part?" and suggests a world of possibilities if we do. I disagree. MCP is a protocol based on meagre structure and a bulk of human language. Either you
20.
▲
by
urig
1y ago
I appreciate the artistic and programming skills of the developer but not the "cleverness" and "quirkiness" of their announcement post. It took me too long to figure out that this is some sort of distraction-less writing
21.
▲
by
urig
1y ago
My takeaway from this post is not to find better ways to do, but to find a way not to.
22.
▲
by
urig
1y ago
That's an "all or nothing" fallacy, easily countered. One alternative is water. Plus alternative products might be less efficient but less contaminating. Finally, even with Phos-Check, success is far from guaranteed. Bottom l
23.
▲
by
urig
2y ago
I can't believe anyone can fall for this. It's so obviously a modern take on that Rockwell Retro Encabulator joke.
24.
▲
by
urig
2y ago
Rules are put in place to be followed, for a reason. Capital letters at the start of the sentence increase readability. People who don't bother with them are being incosiderate towards their readers.
25.
▲
by
urig
2y ago
You're not the target audience. This is a very well-written explainer for non-techies. I've already emailed it to a couple of friends. Lovely.
26.
▲
by
urig
2y ago
I dunno, techbro. Somehow Meta being the victim here is not the key takeaway that springs to my mind, you know?
27.
▲
by
urig
2y ago
F--- the company. People come first.
28.
▲
by
urig
2y ago
Most of what you wrote sounds fair and almost compassionate to me but hard disagree on "the fact it's cancer is actually largely irrelevant". That person has just received some of the worst news of their lives, for no fault o
29.
▲
by
urig
3y ago
Disappointing that the maintainers need to make a living (or, godforbid, even a profit) and that users can't get everything for free? Nope.
30.
▲
by
urig
3y ago
Cool project, lovely website at https://lubelogger.com/ . In the hope that the maintainers of https://lubelogger.com/ read this: On the homepage under "Showcase" the left and right chevron buttons
More ›