underyx

8 ms·

1.
by underyx 6d ago
I misremembered, it’s actually over 90%, and it involved camouflage: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hNUnU8i2yubt5uesmmV17aTJXhY...
2.
by underyx 6d ago
And red teaming exercises found that ~80% of labs will gladly synthesize known pathogens without safety review.
3.
by underyx 8d ago
No, the highest probability estimate I've seen in this thread is 10% chance in the next 3 years.
4.
by underyx 8d ago
"So you think in 3 years AI is going to solve longstanding math problems because it was used to write some coherent sentences?" — people with the same amount of foresight in 2023
5.
by underyx 17d ago
If more than 0.05% of the rationalist and AI safety community were Zizians this argument might be worth considering for like ten seconds before dismissing it.
6.
by underyx 17d ago
So maybe it is possible to use alternate words in writing without compromising on writing quality after all.
7.
by underyx 1mo ago
What are they gonna think of next, productizing something as trivial as FTP?
8.
by underyx 2mo ago
I'm not sure about the answer here, but this can be caused by the scoring rubric used by given benchmarks. For instance, if a benchmark docks scores for running too many commands or using too much wall-clock time, higher efforts will g
9.
by underyx 2mo ago
I gave the photo to Opus 4.8 and it reconstructed the same script in one shot. Although it did say it had to correct some parts of it based on context where it suspected OCR mistakes.
10.
by underyx 3mo ago
I feel like the Nonogram is AI generated? There’s no way a human would set a perfectly symmetrical “diamond” as a medium difficulty puzzle. Worse yet, the hard difficulty is just “big diamond”, the same thing on a slightly larger grid.
11.
by underyx 4mo ago
you also can't write openai without a pen
12.
by underyx 4mo ago
> the slow performance decays the decays are just more capable other models entering the population, making all prior models lose more frequently
13.
by underyx 5mo ago
> this is an outdated support article from before we had Opus in Pro plans, we rolled it out for Opus 4.5 in Jan and never updated, you can see in the wayback machine here: https://web.archive.org/web/2025120415114
14.
by underyx 7mo ago
If you have an offer, you can and should ask this question of whomever you're coordinating with. They will give you an honest answer.
15.
by underyx 8mo ago
Congrats on the character design and animations! Brought me a smile.
16.
by underyx 9mo ago
I’ve read it multiple times before, it’s irrelevant in this discussion.
17.
by underyx 9mo ago
Ctrl-F 'lines', 0 results Ctrl-F 'code', 0 results What is this comment about?
18.
by underyx 1y ago
This also applies for options exercised before the company reaches $50M in assets. And then the gain from a valuation from $50M to say $1B is all excluded.
19.
by underyx 1y ago
That's a very unsatisfying while probably correct answer. I wish voters stopped accepting this kind of stuff being "impossibly complex" for government.
20.
by underyx 1y ago
Well that just confuses me more, if the losses are spread out across all these counties each with their own revenue, why isn't that the default place where money is allocated from?
21.
by underyx 1y ago
Uneducated question, seems like Philadelphia has around $5B of revenue a year, and the transit deficit is ~$200M. I understand the city has to provide services and a lot of the revenue will be restricted as to what it can be allocated to. B
22.
by underyx 1y ago
Great read. I have a tiny, inconsequential, possibly wrong correction. You had assumed that the “Negative” word on the internal search engine screenshot was sentiment analysis. I think it was instead a button to report the post in the inter
23.
by underyx 1y ago
Internet Archive
24.
by underyx 1y ago
Thanks for the actual answer!
25.
by underyx 1y ago
Why are these restrictions in place?
26.
by underyx 1y ago
The author of this post would love the video game Lingo: https://store.steampowered.com/app/1814170/Lingo/
27.
by underyx 1y ago
What’s the danger exactly?
28.
by underyx 1y ago
From what I can tell the effective value of the "Cache Exchange Fund (After fees and expenses)" portfolio will be $660,282 once liquidating to actually use the money? Is the point that this allows waiting for a possible lower tax
29.
by underyx 1y ago
Also this PDF contains a detail I haven't seen reported elsewhere: > Furthermore, on Monday, April 7, 2025, while my client and my team were preparing this disclosure, someone physically taped a threatening note to Mr. Berulis’ home
30.
by underyx 1y ago
Even the nutritional labels printed on packaging are only around 90% accurate. It’s all downhill from there.

More ›