unbit

5 ms·

1.
Unreal Engine Python has been improved with full reflection and editor scripting(github.com)
1 points by unbit 10y ago|0 comments
2.
Write your games in Python with Unreal Engine 4(github.com)
3 points by unbit 10y ago|0 comments
3.
Using OpenBSD 5.7 new httpd server with uWSGI(github.com)
1 points by unbit 11y ago|0 comments
4.
Foohid: an OS X driver for implementing virtual HID devices(github.com)
2 points by unbit 12y ago|0 comments
5.
by unbit 12y ago
POSIX has lot of methods, i did not found a more HTTP-compliant way to deal with it. If you have ideas feel free to expose them, i would be really happy to simplify the specs. Regarding 9P, SpockFS is a fork of the 9spock project (unfortuna
6.
by unbit 12y ago
lol :) but as already said there is no standard for POSIX access via HTTP. (WebDAV is not a competitor here, it is only the cause that pushed the development of spockfs)
7.
by unbit 12y ago
Seeing it from the perspective of a network filesystem (WebDAV by itself is a lot more, albeit afaik has never been used seriously as an authoring tool) it is a bit over-engineered, but the real problem (expecially when dealing with CardDAV
8.
SpockFS – An HTTP-based network filesystem(github.com)
55 points by unbit 12y ago|12 comments
9.
Vpn-ws 0.2 (vpn over websockets) is available with client-side bridge mode(github.com)
2 points by unbit 12y ago|0 comments
10.
by unbit 12y ago
at this point i have no idea of what an ssl vpn is :). The two kind of them i am aware of are openvpn-like (a custom service running on a tcp/udp port, but not on http) or the ones that are more "proxies" to internal networks
11.
by unbit 12y ago
Lot of networks have only access to http/https services, in addition to this you get (for free) all of the authentication mechanisms supported by webservers (like kerberos, radius, ldap and so on ...)
12.
Vpn-ws – A VPN system over websockets(github.com)
14 points by unbit 12y ago|4 comments
13.
by unbit 12y ago
Ruby support in uWSGI is really solid, and it is more used than you can think of (As an example the biggest italian rubyonrails site run over it, and you will find a bunch of interesting blog posts about it combined with ruby). The main iss
14.
UWSGI plugin for integration between the Emperor and Docker is available(github.com)
3 points by unbit 12y ago|0 comments
15.
by unbit 14y ago
uWSGI works with PyPY (Obviously with lot of limitations on the features). http://projects.unbit.it/uwsgi/wiki/PyPy The problem is that for the vast majority of the webapps there is (still) no advantage. I only wanted to focus on that as
16.
by unbit 14y ago
If net/http (or whatever http wrapper in whatever language) gives you enough batteries for a web application i am really happy for you. Sadly me (and a lot of other people) need a lot more. That is why the uWSGI project exists. Things like
17.
by unbit 14y ago
The uWSGI project solved that "issue" (really, i have difficults calling it an issue, but i can understand the point of passenger guys) with the "uWSGI Emperor" more than one year ago in a pretty elegant (and system-friendly) way. You may w
18.
The Blastbeat server gets SPDY support(github.com)
3 points by unbit 14y ago|0 comments
19.
The BlastBeat server(github.com)
26 points by unbit 14y ago|3 comments
20.
by unbit 14y ago
please do not use the suid binary approach, it is something really avoidable in various way. Check the --touch-reload option of uWSGI, you can create an empty file (writable by the user making commits/push) and use it to signal reloading.
21.
by unbit 14y ago
Take it as an "infrastructure"/"swiss army knife" for hosting and deployment. Most of its features are still topic of research in autoscaling,management, tuning and so on... Most of the users do not need that features, but others (like the
22.
by unbit 15y ago
you can directly link uWSGI with varnish using http protocol instead of the uwsgi one: http://projects.unbit.it/uwsgi/wiki/Example#varnish
23.
by unbit 15y ago
in both gunicorn and php you have to choose the number of workers/processes. Most of the time (unless you use php-fastcgi) the number of php processes is choosen by the sysadmin as it maps 1:1 with apache processes. The same is true for mod
24.
by unbit 15y ago
No, uWSGI has nothing to do with performance. Its strength is in the features and operational modes. Each application is diferent from the others and (could) requires specific tuning. This is the spirit of the project, that is at the opposi
25.
by unbit 15y ago
supervisor is great, but if you want to host multiple applications the best way would be the uWSGI Emperor http://projects.unbit.it/uwsgi/wiki/Emperor Regarding the benchmark, it is a bit outdated and the apache+mod_wsgi analysys/configur
26.
by unbit 15y ago
uWSGI supports HTTP and FastCGI too, natively. Using the uwsgi protocol (that has nothing to do with WSGI standard) is only a way to increase performance and add a bunch of features. uWSGI and gunicorn are very different projects, with very
27.
UWSGI 0.9.7 is available(projects.unbit.it)
3 points by unbit 16y ago|1 comments
28.
Preliminary documentation on uWSGI Clustering infrastructure available(projects.unbit.it)
16 points by unbit 16y ago|2 comments
29.
Experimental Ruby 1.9 fiber support in uWSGI rack plugin(projects.unbit.it)
1 points by unbit 16y ago|0 comments