Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
unapologetic
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
unapologetic
7y ago
Now you dream of an absurd and unsustainable lifestyle.
2.
▲
by
unapologetic
7y ago
The original issue is supposedly fingerprinting and privacy related. If that's true then Google should be called out for their poor behaviour.
3.
▲
by
unapologetic
7y ago
as we should. Human makes a mistake, they could have been tired, distracted, got something in their eye, or anything else. Machine makes a mistake, it becomes a question of why and will it make that same mistake every time?
4.
▲
by
unapologetic
7y ago
Big difference between being "against" self-driving cars and simply not buying into the hype. I don't buy into the hype, and I certainly don't buy what Tesla is promising.
5.
▲
by
unapologetic
7y ago
> But they are currently innovating massively in machine learning and other data analytics. I bet I could find that exact sentence used somewhere to justify wework as a "tech company".
6.
▲
by
unapologetic
7y ago
Now please treat Tesla as a car manufacturer instead of "Tech"
7.
▲
by
unapologetic
7y ago
Using the most powerful office in the world to grift and enhance personal wealth sounds like the exact type of thing a billionaire would do. Bloomberg did it and he was only Mayor of NYC. > Dumb people do not win presidential elections R
8.
▲
by
unapologetic
7y ago
Why are you being downvoted for pointing out mass surveillance and extremely targeted surveillance are both still legal and frequently used.
9.
▲
by
unapologetic
7y ago
in doing so it leeches money from places it would be more useful and further enriches and entrenches defense contractors.
10.
▲
by
unapologetic
7y ago
Seriously. You don't have to trust microsoft to realize that their linux interest is genuine. It's just smart business.
11.
▲
by
unapologetic
7y ago
If Windows 10 is really evergreen then they could do it over the course of years.
12.
▲
by
unapologetic
7y ago
This is true, but they could start open sourcing components. It's a hard problem but one MS has dealt with before.
13.
▲
by
unapologetic
7y ago
I would honestly much rather have consistent 4g speeds than try to jump to something faster. In the middle of Seattle there are still holes in coverage where I data speeds slow to a complete crawl.
14.
▲
by
unapologetic
7y ago
Except he was her boss at google, google forced her into a position she didn't want, and he encouraged her to quit under false pretenses. This is a high level google executive engaging in grossly unprofessional behavior with one of his
15.
▲
by
unapologetic
7y ago
> And the answer to that question makes it plausible that Google has been protecting bad people at the cost of their idealistic but achievable missions. Which of googles missions is idealistic?
16.
▲
by
unapologetic
7y ago
Peter Thiel has an extremely vested interest in preserving the status-quo. Frankly I think the notion that he knows all that much about genuinely creating any sort of movement to be questionable at best. It's not about changing the wor
17.
▲
by
unapologetic
7y ago
> Maybe he was the prey. Yeah maybe. She's the one who wound up being abandoned with a kid though. > You cannot refuse to pay child support, it's one option you do not have. Play hard ball in response to stuff etc maybe, but
18.
▲
by
unapologetic
7y ago
Because when you simply accept the world as is, it looks a lot like you're endorsing the status quo. Especially on this site where a lot of people seem to take a weird pseudo-detached outlook. Trying to analyze things in an almost enti
19.
▲
by
unapologetic
7y ago
Well she's stuck raising the son of an emotionally abusive sociopath. Besides that he pressured her into quitting with promises of financial support, then left her with the baby and refused to pay. I can't even comprehend the type
20.
▲
by
unapologetic
7y ago
It's not irrelevant, it's a blatant abuse of power. This guy is clearly a pretty sick sort of predator. > How dare a married, billionaire cheater not settle down with her but continue to sleep with other women? He basically got
21.
▲
by
unapologetic
7y ago
This situation is fucked up on multiple levels. You don't punish the subordinate. Given his level, he should have been out. Instead they transferred her from legal to sales and her performance tanked because it was a job she was in no
22.
▲
by
unapologetic
7y ago
He forced the consequences onto her. None of these men will ever actually face consequences. They are all obscenely wealthy and well connected.
23.
▲
by
unapologetic
7y ago
No, it's punishment. It's not down out of cruelty, it's done out of greed. He's more important, so even though he should absolutely 1000% be the one on the chopping block, she gets forced to sales. Then he uses the finan
24.
▲
by
unapologetic
7y ago
oh cool, now I'm a liar too. > I call such comments linkless martyrs You take pride in coining cute little phrases like that? > If so, you can easily prove it with links that show how you were posting like this "for years wi
25.
▲
by
unapologetic
7y ago
> downvotes were from other users. Well of course they were. High karma users get to decide what is allowed on HN. It's a pretty bad system.
26.
▲
by
unapologetic
7y ago
> I asked what you wanted to know, but reading this response, it doesn't seem like you want to know things so much as to fulminate against HN and how it is moderated. and instead of reflecting on that for a minute you will continue
27.
▲
by
unapologetic
7y ago
No response and more downvotes. Exactly what I expected.
28.
▲
by
unapologetic
7y ago
Nah, this was the sort of guy who decided to leave the team (not midori this was years later in a different org) and then figures it's okay to act like a jerk on the way out the door. Some (junior) engineer on another team made a bad s
29.
▲
by
unapologetic
7y ago
> What would you like to know? What are the actual rules? You are the most arbitrary and least transparent mod I've ever dealt with. You wield the word "unsubstantive" as a cudgel. You seemingly only hold the goal of stifl
30.
▲
by
unapologetic
7y ago
oh look, downvoted again. The downvoting system on this site is a really broken by design sort of feature. It's entirely just a manner to ensure the groupthink stays on track.
More ›