uhhhd

6 ms·

1.
by uhhhd 1mo ago
Sometimes it feels like hiring ethics folks is almost all downside for companies. I genuinely don’t understand why they keep doing it. It seems like the pattern is almost always the same: the ethics team exists quietly in the background, an
2.
by uhhhd 2mo ago
Counterpoint: This no longer matters because we are not going back to hand-writing these functions. These patterns were designed to make code easier for humans to read and write, but that is no longer the primary way software is built.
3.
by uhhhd 5mo ago
It can be both. People ride horses for leisure; no one commutes on them.
4.
by uhhhd 5mo ago
This. Exactly this. You'll be unemployed. He'll still have tenure.
5.
by uhhhd 5mo ago
I think we’re talking past each other. My point isn’t that jj is bad. It’s that it’s solving problems that are rapidly becoming irrelevant. Tools like git and jj exist to help humans manage state: branches, commits, rebases, conflicts, hist
6.
by uhhhd 5mo ago
You don’t need jj for this anymore. The whole premise of optimizing human workflows around source control is becoming obsolete. When LLMs are driving development, source control stops being an active cognitive concern and becomes a passive
7.
by uhhhd 5mo ago
I love this stuff as a hobbyist, but professionally I can't help but think this is all obsolete in the age of agent-driven development. I wish jj was around a decade ago.
8.
by uhhhd 7mo ago
There are towns in England and America where I can't understand them today.
9.
by uhhhd 8mo ago
Yes supporting the Islamists puts you in the same league as the Islamists.
10.
by uhhhd 8mo ago
"Palestine Action" is terrorism.
11.
by uhhhd 8mo ago
No it did/is not.
12.
by uhhhd 8mo ago
GPT wrapper.
13.
by uhhhd 9mo ago
So true, why is that whole sector so bad?
14.
by uhhhd 9mo ago
This is petty and bad business. No serious entrepreneur or leader worth his salt cares about this.
15.
by uhhhd 9mo ago
Nowhere in the article does he explain why the use of AI is inherently problematic or why it necessitates rewriting the project plan. Work product is either good or bad, and responsibility for its quality rests with the person delivering it
16.
by uhhhd 9mo ago
Terrorism targets civilians. So no, this isn't terrorism.
17.
by uhhhd 11mo ago
This is wise
18.
by uhhhd 1y ago
Does this hurt the bird?
19.
by uhhhd 1y ago
or.... they were in the process of building bombs. (or what you said, but probably bombs).
20.
by uhhhd 1y ago
The photos of the facilities are literally all over the internet. The IAEA knew about it and knew Iran was enriching weapons grade uranium. This isn't Iraq 2.
21.
by uhhhd 1y ago
References to Israel are not unnecessary details when protestors call for the elimination of the only existing Jewish state. Anti-Zionism isn't criticism of Israel. Its eliminationist rhetoric and plainly bigoted.
22.
by uhhhd 1y ago
"I know there were specific instances of Anti-Semitism, which were wrong and should be punished, but is there evidence Harvard didn't take action for those?" That is literally the allegation made in the lawsuit. And calling t
23.
by uhhhd 1y ago
Because the reputational damage to Harvard would probably exceed the minimal cost of litigating this (given its endowment) if they thought they would win. It's not evidence in legal sense, but it's a strong suggestion of culpabili
24.
by uhhhd 1y ago
That Harvard chose to settle this lawsuit rather than litigate it. https://www.kasowitz.com/media/unxcnvpo/harvard-complaint.pd...
25.
by uhhhd 1y ago
If you prefer a summary: Key Allegations: 1. Hostile Environment: The complaint describes a campus atmosphere where pro-Hamas students and faculty have organized demonstrations featuring antisemitic slogans and calls for violence against J
26.
by uhhhd 1y ago
Why not try to do the minimum amount of research before complaining about it online? Here's a complaint from a recent lawsuit by a collection of Jewish Harvard students against the university. It's a good starting point. https:&#
27.
by uhhhd 2y ago
The Middle East Monitor is Qatari state propaganda.
28.
by uhhhd 2y ago
Why was this flagged?
29.
by uhhhd 2y ago
Fast fire. You've gotten past the hard part, admitting the mistake. The quicker you let someone like that go, the better for you and your team. The mistake here would be to work on their performance and drag it on. Your team morale wil
30.
by uhhhd 3y ago
based.

More ›