Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
uejfiweun
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
1.
▲
by
uejfiweun
5d ago
OpenAI definitely seems like the company most likely to doom humanity. Their CEO is a psychopath megalomaniac, and they've clearly dropped all pretense at trying to be safe in their quest to capture coding market share from Anthropic.
2.
▲
by
uejfiweun
24d ago
Seeing a lot of people in here say that they need Fable for the tasks they're doing and Opus just isn't enough. My experience could not be more different. I seriously feel like Opus-level performance is totally adequate for most o
3.
▲
by
uejfiweun
25d ago
...what? I don't think they're talking about hallucinations here, they're talking about public opinion.
4.
▲
by
uejfiweun
29d ago
Or maybe, just maybe, it's both. As with basically all things like this in life. Obviously, you need a great leader, and you need a great team. Like look at Hidetaka Miyazaki's work on Demon's Souls and then go and tell me th
5.
▲
by
uejfiweun
1mo ago
No no no, absolutely not. There's only one man that should be allowed these privileges, and his name is Dario. Dario alone can deliver us to salvation. The lord himself shalt smite these companies and models from this barren earth, and
6.
▲
by
uejfiweun
1mo ago
I know nothing. But when I see headlines like this, and our dwindling missile stockpiles, and the fact that we have moved all carriers away from Asia, and the many other worrying things, I have to ask - are we about to get attacked? We seem
7.
▲
by
uejfiweun
1mo ago
Yeah, this most certainly isn't happening.
8.
▲
by
uejfiweun
1mo ago
Bizarre! Love it :)
9.
▲
by
uejfiweun
1mo ago
I think Google realized that it's more profitable to sell compute to AI labs than to make AI. They are not an ideologically driven company like Anthropic. They very much turned into a conventional company that just wants to protect the
10.
▲
by
uejfiweun
2mo ago
It's funny how Google is essentially trying to compete with the software side of Tesla only - Waymos (which AFAIK they plan to partner with major automakers), now this, etc.
11.
▲
by
uejfiweun
2mo ago
Is it really so hard to understand that open models are behind and yet they are also continually improving and way better than they were a year ago? Like I'm not sure what your point is here. Are you purposely playing dumb to troll peo
12.
▲
by
uejfiweun
2mo ago
This is such a smooth-brain reply, dude. The capability literally exists, today. You're telling me that it's just SO fantastical that people will be able to catch up? Give me a break. Anthropic and OpenAI are not staffed by demigo
13.
▲
by
uejfiweun
2mo ago
All you've said needs the qualifier - "for now!" Look at the trend line. It's clear that if they're not yet at the level of being "good enough" for coding, they will be soon. Sensationalist headlines aside
14.
▲
by
uejfiweun
2mo ago
I know that Flash is obviously no Opus or Fable. That being said, when I want a very quick response, my go-to is Gemini Flash. It's just really damn fast and generally tends to be accurate enough.
15.
▲
by
uejfiweun
2mo ago
This was notably one of the "training programs" that Neo went through in The Matrix, along with a variety of other martial art styles.
16.
▲
by
uejfiweun
2mo ago
Fable is very bad at wasting tokens when it comes to doing these renderings and diffs - I had the exact same experience as you.
17.
▲
by
uejfiweun
2mo ago
What makes you think the supply crunch is short-term?
18.
▲
by
uejfiweun
2mo ago
The reason is because AI is viewed by the powers that be as inexorably linked to national security. If you haven't noticed, every lab out there has the same excuse when pressed about the disruption caused by their technology - "we
19.
▲
by
uejfiweun
2mo ago
Of course not. This coming crash will be where we learn that tech is "too big to fail" in the same way that the financial system is. They'll let one player fail (likely Anthropic, due to the constant fighting with the governm
20.
▲
by
uejfiweun
2mo ago
What are you talking about? We're literally in the middle of one of the most transformative technological revolutions we've ever had.
21.
▲
by
uejfiweun
3mo ago
I think at the end of the day, we're still able to produce really effective technology and products. Like the economy is still functioning. I feel like this is different from the Soviet situation where the problems were more related to
22.
▲
by
uejfiweun
3mo ago
We were stuck in the Gilded Age for decades before Roosevelt came along and started big trust-busting efforts. I expect a similar situation to play out here. We're probably in the middle of it in retrospect.
23.
▲
by
uejfiweun
3mo ago
Now this... this is a hot take. How exactly do you expect these companies to "help humanity" if they're bleeding money?
24.
▲
by
uejfiweun
3mo ago
I wish I had a good answer to give you here. I really don't understand financial markets. I more so just have a basic understanding of history and technology - my individual stock purchases are mostly me taking my knowledge base and ex
25.
▲
by
uejfiweun
3mo ago
... does it? Are you seeing something I'm not seeing? Number one is that this just doesn't appear to be true (non-lite versions beat it across the board it seems), number two is that this specifically is a low-cost bulk model and
26.
▲
by
uejfiweun
3mo ago
This is probably a hot take and I am by no means a financial expert and this is probably quite wrong. I personally think that attempting to value these companies using the same methodology as the history of all American companies is fundame
27.
▲
by
uejfiweun
3mo ago
What are you even talking about? Everyone knows that Anthropic is drastically subsidizing their plans. It's actually the exact opposite of what you're talking about. The costs are extremely high and the prices are actually what&#x
28.
▲
by
uejfiweun
3mo ago
Yeah, it's not that computer use is the most theoretically optimal paradigm, but there's a reasonable case that given the constraints of modern software systems and how they're built, that it's the most realistically o
29.
▲
by
uejfiweun
3mo ago
It depends on what you consider ineffectual to mean. Ineffectual at making new products and innovating? Yes, definitely. Ineffectual at preserving business momentum and continuing to grow profits? Well, the latest numbers speak for themselv
30.
▲
by
uejfiweun
3mo ago
Is there really a killer app here though? I've tried it and I think the hardware is really cool, but it doesn't really strike me that any of the software justifies the purchase price.
More ›