ubnvfft

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by ubnvfft 2y ago

   Also mind you when that “risk” comes knocking it results in mass layoffs. So who really took on that risk? The csuites or the wage workers?
2. 2.▲
   by ubnvfft 2y ago

   I think once you understand how to apply analytic continuation to the problem its relation to primes is much more apparent; even without a full understanding of the history. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analytic_cont
3. 3.▲
   by ubnvfft 2y ago

   Stop speciously muddying the waters by either intentionally or accidentally making spurious arguments for these unethical sociopaths. I’ve seen this argument made on this website a lot, and it always conveniently omits the vertical integrat
4. 4.▲
   by ubnvfft 2y ago

   Yes, and yes. Investigating primes is nearly as old as mathematics itself and its reasonable to assume other ideas where discovered in the hopes of applying them to various problems incorporating prime numbers. From a practical, applied, pe
5. 5.▲
   by ubnvfft 2y ago

   I think “loses” lends itself to clickbait. It’s either 0 or massful. “Loses”, to my eye, implied a continuous ability to remove mass, and led me to wonder if one could achieve negative masses with the experiment’s technique. But I’ll save y
6. 6.▲
   by ubnvfft 2y ago

   The grift that keeps on grifting. The ad buys on network tv are proof enough. They are embarrassing, and often offensive: are you lazy? Terrible at your job? Hate your family? Use our AI assistant to replace your humanity! If they had a rea