Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
tyyyy3
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
tyyyy3
4mo ago
Can we build a list of the actual nerds who care? Need it for my future recruitment needs lol.
2.
▲
by
tyyyy3
4mo ago
I think its a direct reflection of the fact that most people really prefer to go-go-go and not spend the time up-front thinking about what their project even is, why it matters and is it worth dedicated resources toward it. The abandonment
3.
▲
by
tyyyy3
4mo ago
"I feel like we could leap ahead a decade if people could divorce "we use language, and it uses language so it is like us"," Or maybe just maybe... the thing should be much better designed around the human. That's h
4.
▲
by
tyyyy3
4mo ago
The more difficult it is to trace one’s labour to output.. expect more theatrics ;)
5.
▲
by
tyyyy3
4mo ago
Exactly what I expected to read after reading the first part of your post lol. I’m starting to realise, many people and the management themselves don’t really understand why the firm exists, and what they do. Funny to watch tbh
6.
▲
by
tyyyy3
4mo ago
I agree generally but there are periods where creative people show up and a whole slew of existing firms go bust/shrink due to one’s ability to envision a path toward creative destruction.
7.
▲
by
tyyyy3
4mo ago
Your post weeks of pure arrogance. You sound like the bozo’s at Anthropic who made an AI agent for finance and think this is somehow going to provide a huge productivity boost because all they do is a bunch of tick boxing and spreadsheet wo
8.
▲
by
tyyyy3
4mo ago
The problem of life in general is the last 5-10% is always the hardest. And it makes no economic sense in many cases to invest in trying to make that last part mechanised. I believe the llm providers went with the wrong approach from the of
9.
▲
by
tyyyy3
4mo ago
Correct me if I’m wrong Simon, but weren’t you highly optimistic about llm’s and agentic-use of them? I believe this is a common fault of not being able to zoom out and look at what trade offs are being made. There’s always trade-offs, the
10.
▲
by
tyyyy3
4mo ago
Hype
11.
▲
by
tyyyy3
4mo ago
This is an empty statement - if you pour in hundreds of billions should you not expect progress? The question is will these firms be able to continue to spend at that rate. The managers of the firms don’t necessarily have control over that
12.
▲
by
tyyyy3
4mo ago
I did a degree in comp sci but my focus through my career is at the intersection of product design, economics and corporate finance/valuation whilst working with software engineers. Im beginning to realise people who are too concentrat
13.
▲
by
tyyyy3
4mo ago
I strongly believe increasing the rate at which one produces code misses the point. If engineers already know up front with clarity what they need to build, and, the leadership are very focused and concentrate resources on doing a few thing