twnettytwo

16 ms·

1.
by twnettytwo 2mo ago
IMO this isn't necessarily bad (it's one way to get data), but the numbers are meaningless without a control. Unfortunately, I think we missed that bus by ~20 years. Had the same study been conducted every few years over the last
2.
by twnettytwo 3mo ago
Just as more successful machine learning fields distanced themselves from the term during the AI winter, I suppose we will (and perhaps are?) be seeing them adopt it again, now that we are in an "AI summer".
3.
by twnettytwo 1y ago
Not a biologist but IIRC, male ants develop from unfertilized eggs (and are 'haploid'), and the sperm has no role in the production of male ants. Any fertilized egg produces a female ant. This would proably mean that the queen has
4.
by twnettytwo 2y ago
This is likely just Journalism, but the title (that of the original article) is slightly misleading. This appears to be a programming language for modelling soft materials... although I am not sure (having looked only at the Github repo and
5.
by twnettytwo 2y ago
Was it perhaps 'A course on Group Theory' by John S. Rose?
6.
by twnettytwo 2y ago
> I forgot it at home As a non-native speaker, I find the sentence equally disconcerting, but it leaves me wondering what one would use to say something to that effect.
7.
by twnettytwo 2y ago
If they aren't distinct, you wouldn't have 4 clean buttons, but just 3 - in which case we also know the repeating digit repeats exactly once and we get 12x3 (36) possible combinations. With two clean buttons, it's 6 (if both
8.
by twnettytwo 2y ago
Then the liar isn't lying, as the statement is true.