twayt

10 ms·

1.
by twayt 3y ago
This is actually pretty useful
2.
by twayt 3y ago
Also checkout www.askYouTube.ai Which does essentially this but requires no indexing of videos!
3.
by twayt 3y ago
Yea I think this is the most reasonable take. You can always check information before believing or acting on it. However it’s often super difficult to even get started and know what it is that you should be reading more about.
4.
by twayt 3y ago
This description is wrong on so many levels. Amphetamine is primarily absorbed through the plasma membranes and not DAT since it’s lipid soluble. Dopamine does not and thus relies on DAT. By inhibiting DAT (as both amphetamine and Modafinil
5.
by twayt 3y ago
You get the same result in a short span of time, heck you may even get a reliable error bound. Where this falls apart is that error accumulates over time and not just for one heap of sand but for many such heaps of sand that also interact w
6.
by twayt 3y ago
We need to bring back Kazaa
7.
by twayt 3y ago
Also try www.askYouTube.ai for q&a across multiple videos!
8.
by twayt 3y ago
Its fixed now unfortunately the email you provided on the contact form bounces.
9.
by twayt 3y ago
Despite the rude comments you left on my contact form, I have noted your point and am making changes to fix this.
10.
by twayt 3y ago
Also try www.askYouTube.ai, not exactly pure text search but it can help you find videos that answer your query using LLMs
11.
by twayt 3y ago
Thinly veiled attempt to advertise bentoml, their startup. You can just use huggingface and Automatic111 for this, not sure why this is needed at all.
12.
by twayt 3y ago
Did you just completely ignore the basis of my comment and instead specifically respond to what I explicitly explained was not the point I was making?
13.
by twayt 3y ago
I find your statement about the Edison quote disingenuous. I did some reading about the origin of the quote and it isn’t as cut and dry as you seem to claim. Also, the quote is meaningful because Edison said it, not because the quote has me
14.
by twayt 3y ago
Installed it, can't even get through the tedious intro and stuff
15.
AskYoutube – Ask YouTube Anything(askyoutube.ai)
2 points by twayt 3y ago|0 comments
16.
by twayt 3y ago
People have a visceral reaction to the image of them being in a self driving car and hurtling to their death with no control. What they don’t have a visceral reaction is to be saved from a collision with a drunk driver or their own error. N
17.
by twayt 3y ago
Until you get models with completely disentangled feature spaces such that you know that the influence of a piece of data is completely removed (at the limit this is something like an embedding DB), there is absolutely no way you can claim
18.
by twayt 3y ago
> They probably can: No, actually they probably can’t. There is no verifiable way to remove the data from the model apart from completely removing all instances of information from the training data. The project you linked only describes
19.
by twayt 3y ago
If you recite enough small snippets, you make a large one. Especially with ChatGPT you can probe the model by asking certain questions about the material at hand to see if it has seen the entire book. Also you don’t have to be able to recit
20.
by twayt 3y ago
Libgen / Scihub or not, if the model can provide details about the book other than just high level info like the summary and no explicit deal with the publisher has been made, you can make a strong argument that it is plagiarism. Even
21.
by twayt 3y ago
Sounds like an FB shill
22.
by twayt 3y ago
Yea you can create the nicest office of all time, still wouldn't want to live there or trade it for my own private personal space. Way happier to work hard and contribute to the company when I feel like I don't have to be forced t
23.
by twayt 3y ago
This is a pretty simplistic take tbh. Reddit makes money from ads having reach and they're hoping that only a small percentage get premium so that they can continue to make money off of ads. Why would they reduce the reach their ads ar
24.
by twayt 3y ago
It's this perception that assumes that CEOs can do no right by the people if there is a financial interest in not doing so. Whether you believe this is the case or not, you have to agree that all nuance goes out the window and the mob
25.
by twayt 3y ago
Yea the CEO's response was tone deaf and not tactful at all. However, it seems insane that people are complaining about this for the following reason: 1. Reddit is not profitable, it is literally bleeding money. 2. No Reddit = No 3P ap
26.
by twayt 3y ago
I suspect you have adopted the speech patterns of people you respect criticizing LLMs of lacking “reasoning” and “understanding” capabilities without thinking about it carefully yourself. 1. How would you define these concepts so that incon
27.
by twayt 3y ago
Just because it makes mistakes on a domain that may not be part of it's data and/or architectural capabilities doesn't mean it can't do what humans consider "reasoning". Once again, I implore you to come up wit
28.
by twayt 3y ago
If you understand transformers, you’d know that they’re doing precisely that. They’re taking a sequence of tokens (symbols), manipulating them (matrix multiplication is ultimately just moving things around and re-weighting - the same operat
29.
by twayt 3y ago
Any program you write is encoded reasoning. I’d argue if-then statements are reasoning too. Even if you do write a garbage next word predictor, it would still be reasoning. It’s just a qualitative assessment that it would be good reasoning.
30.
by twayt 3y ago
I don’t think they’re mutually exclusive. Next word prediction IS reasoning. It cannot do arbitrarily complex reasoning but many people have used the next word prediction mechanism to chain together multiple outputs to produce something aki

More ›