Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
tutts
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
tutts
8y ago
Unfortunately (or fortunately, really, from a broader perspective) you wouldn't be allowed to use the patent system to bar other people from asserting their rights in court.
2.
▲
by
tutts
8y ago
Miners used to bring canary birds with them when mining. If they hit poisonous gas, the canary would die before the miners, alerting them to the gas. The government can issue secret warrants to companies that they are not allowed to disclos
3.
▲
by
tutts
8y ago
I once looked into whether it was possible to get a ".ck" domain name, for juvenile and obvious yet potentially humorous domains. It turns out that that's Cook Islands' TLD, and they don't allow direct use of it...
4.
▲
by
tutts
8y ago
I think that statement asks that you let the parent have final say over how you interact with their children, not that you cater to their every whim because their child is disabled.
5.
▲
by
tutts
8y ago
The first amendment does apply - just, it applies the other way around. The primary function of media sites is to broadcast their users' messages, and in doing so they're exercising their own freedom of speech. To force them to br
6.
▲
by
tutts
9y ago
Or maybe it's a metaphorical expression of sadness over the recent death of a respected idol?
7.
▲
by
tutts
9y ago
I don't dispute that. What I dispute is the implication that they had been instructed to do so by Google.
8.
▲
by
tutts
9y ago
Of course it can. Taking this action against someone with a political stance opposite from yours may be a mistake you're more likely to make, but it's still a mistake. Besides that, the point I was trying to make was less about wh
9.
▲
by
tutts
9y ago
Eh. The explanation they offered that they were hiring a large mass of moderators and some of them made mistakes is more than plausible. When they add that many people it's really inevitable that someone would get over-eager or misread
10.
▲
by
tutts
9y ago
Sure, but what of significance has changed? Every time you run a program, you're trusting the developer not to do nefarious things like reading your Chrome credentials, because the only assurance you have is the developer's word a
11.
▲
by
tutts
9y ago
"How do we know that FSLabs don’t use this, just because they say so?" How do you know the main executable doesn't do the same thing? How is trusting them not to run this .exe different from trusting them not to secretly impl
12.
▲
by
tutts
9y ago
Businesses don't have to abide by EU law when doing business with EU citizens, but when doing business in the EU. It's a small, but sometimes meaningful, distinction.
13.
▲
by
tutts
9y ago
Only if "as individually as possible" means perfect prediction. If you assume that there's a limit to how well the future can be predicted, insurance still has value. Also, car insurance specifically is usually legally mandat
14.
▲
by
tutts
9y ago
I looked up the case [1]. The copyright claims, as well as one of the claims for breach of contract, were dismissed without prejudice, which (as far as I understand) means he failed to allege enough facts to support his claim, but can come
15.
▲
by
tutts
10y ago
Not if laser guns are a part of the race. Then it's just competitive.
16.
▲
by
tutts
10y ago
I don't agree with Trump either, I was trying to question the idea that American politics are based almost exclusively on image and that makes it impossible that this election could have been influenced by actual issues.
17.
▲
by
tutts
10y ago
>Since when were American politics about issues rather than image? Since today, apparently.
18.
▲
by
tutts
10y ago
So the sites should drop the safety features because there exists a user who would not be personally inconvenienced by the theft of their credit card details?
19.
▲
by
tutts
10y ago
She's claiming a physical reaction, not an emotional one. While we can't know if she's feeling nauseous, it's perfectly reasonable to doubt her conclusion that this is caused by Huang's statement.
20.
▲
by
tutts
10y ago
I disagree. That is, I agree that you should ultimately own your data and have the right to decide what Facebook is allowed to do with it, to have them tell you what data they have, and to have them delete it. I don't agree that you sh
21.
▲
by
tutts
11y ago
It does if you hit the submit button, but not if you just hit Enter.
22.
▲
by
tutts
11y ago
And yet we're possibly about to throw out that model because something better might have come along.
23.
▲
by
tutts
12y ago
Isn't solving problems they didn't create exactly what police work is all about?
24.
▲
by
tutts
12y ago
I really did get stuck. http://imgur.com/syZX03k