Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
turbolent
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
1.
▲
by
turbolent
11mo ago
... in browsers. Which at best JIT compile. There are several WASM runtimes that AOT compile and have significantly better performance (e.g. ~5-10% slower). The title is highly misleading.
2.
▲
by
turbolent
2y ago
GCC just got musttail too: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83324#c27
3.
▲
TigerSwift: Write Swift Apps for Mac OS X Tiger
(twitter.com)
2 points
by
turbolent
2y ago
|
0 comments
4.
▲
by
turbolent
3y ago
Very few languages have "Some Language -> C" or "Some Language -> non-common OS / arch combo". The "just" part is a whole new backend, which is a massive amount of work for common languages. But it t
5.
▲
by
turbolent
3y ago
Exactly!
6.
▲
by
turbolent
3y ago
You do not have to deal with the generated C, simply consider it the IR. The main benefit of generating C over LLVM IR is portability: C is supported by far more systems than LLVM can target. For example, it enables porting Rust application
7.
▲
by
turbolent
3y ago
Just to clarify: Compared to wasm2c, w2c2 does not (yet) have sandboxing capabilities, so assumes the translated WebAssembly module is trustworthy. The main "goal" of w2c2 so far has been allowing to port applications and librari
8.
▲
by
turbolent
8y ago
If you are looking for a more flexible solution with support for any layout and support for animations, something like iOS' UICollectionView or Android's RecyclerView, have a look at https://github.com/turbolent&#x
9.
▲
MEGA65 – Open 8-Bit Computer
(mega65.org)
49 points
by
turbolent
11y ago
|
6 comments
10.
▲
Into the Turing tar-pit
(turbolent.com)
11 points
by
turbolent
12y ago
|
0 comments
11.
▲
by
turbolent
12y ago
Impressive. What are the differences for decoding/load time? Especially on mobile devices this is a big deciding factor.
12.
▲
by
turbolent
12y ago
The paper ( http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~nlao/publication/2014.kdd.pdf ) mentions the extracted knowledge base is about 38 times larger than DeepDive's, the largest previous comparable system.
13.
▲
by
turbolent
12y ago
Paper: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~nlao/publication/2014.kdd.pdf
14.
▲
Building Paper
(youtube.com)
2 points
by
turbolent
12y ago
|
0 comments
15.
▲
by
turbolent
12y ago
There's a really nice explanation at http://galaxy.agh.edu.pl/~vlsi/AI/backp_t_en/backprop.html
16.
▲
by
turbolent
13y ago
It's object-oriented and especially designed to be extensible. The slides on the pages contain many examples. It's fairly stand-alone and isn't integrated into an IDE. However, it's small, which allows for easy implement
17.
▲
by
turbolent
13y ago
Looks very similar to OMeta ( http://tinlizzie.org/ometa/ )
18.
▲
OpenMP/Clang
(clang-omp.github.io)
1 points
by
turbolent
13y ago
|
0 comments
19.
▲
by
turbolent
15y ago
http://www.limbikfreq.com/ http://somafm.com/
20.
▲
by
turbolent
15y ago
Really liked http://dribbble.com/shots/282948-Raspberry-Pi
21.
▲
by
turbolent
15y ago
At the beginning I tried implementing various object systems. The first one was indeed multiple inheritance with multimethods, based on C3 linearization ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C3_linearization ) and didn't use the prototype chain, b
22.
▲
by
turbolent
15y ago
I like Dylan ( http://www.opendylan.org/ ) and CL - and I wanted to write both server side and client side web applications in it, so I wrote a compiler for a Lisp that resembles the original prefix/sexp-style Dylan as much as possible, des
23.
▲
by
turbolent
15y ago
I've been working on Ralph for a while now: https://github.com/turbolent/ralph It compiles a major subset of Apple's Dylan ( http://lispm.dyndns.org/documentation/prefix-dylan/book.anno... ) to JavaScript, both for use on a CommonJS imple
24.
▲
by
turbolent
16y ago
Clickable links: http://turbolent.com/ http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/objects/id410949899 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2096730
25.
▲
Ask HN: Review my first app: Objects - semantic search app for the Wikipedia
2 points
by
turbolent
16y ago
|
1 comments