tum92

5 ms·

1.
by tum92 2y ago
Estrogen exposure is a significant risk factor for endometrial cancer, which most commonly occurs in post-menopausal women. It’s a cumulative effect, as are many other things. Not a comment on the parent post, just highlighting that biolo
2.
by tum92 2y ago
Had the pleasure of taking a course of his in undergrad as a newly decided philosophy major. The material was excellent and right up my alley, but more than anything I was stunned by how fluidly and clearly he communicated. Huge loss
3.
by tum92 2y ago
I haven’t read that literature very closely, but will say that I have seen lots of handoffs, and they generally involve someone who has been working 12+ hours, very often 24+ hours, who needs to hand off 10s of patients to 3+ people, all of
4.
by tum92 3y ago
Fun thought, we’re kind of all on one right now! Regardless of how you choose to define “human,” we’ve been around for much less time than a single revolution around the Milky Way. We get no say in the route, and our star is feeding us rath
5.
by tum92 3y ago
> While there's no doubt that self-optimization topics seem to attract more men than women, why is it that people who are into gender, equality and "toxic masculinity" topics … always have to put a label on everything, suc
6.
by tum92 3y ago
I assumed you were referring to ‘The Conversation’ piece actually. I’m not sure which part of the article you find woke and/or patronizing? I didn’t read it that way personally. One of the authors of the piece, Chapurukha Kusimba, is E
7.
by tum92 3y ago
>What makes the perfunctory woke preamble in TFA even more insufferable than usual is that a significant aspect of this trade was in slaves. I’m curious which portion of the article you’re referring to? I’m not sure what point from the a
8.
by tum92 4y ago
I had to look that one up because their interpretation seemed so unlikely to me. Doesn’t necessarily mean there is no other history there, but I found out tarballs are real things. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarbal
9.
by tum92 4y ago
Oh the number of ways this model doesn’t match reality couldn’t even be counted. I suppose my standard for achieving an “artificial something” in biology is if accurately reflects reality well enough to learn from, and I only meant to imply
10.
by tum92 4y ago
I had the same initial reaction, but after digging in a little I don’t think “artificial” is the worst description in the world here. I do think the innovation here is much more like an artificial neuron than an artificial synapse though. F
11.
by tum92 4y ago
Work in the field myself. The real answer is definitely we don’t know, but for whatever reason a high diversity (lots of different kinds of bacteria) seems to be almost universally good. Fiber is the major carbohydrate source for our gut mi
12.
by tum92 5y ago
Immunology is wildly complicated so my description is going to fall short of reality, but my understanding of the role of the adaptive immune system as it would relate to mRNA therapies is different. Lymphocytes, or T cells & B cells, a
13.
by tum92 5y ago
HGT is fascinating & important, but it’s also completely accepted, recognized, and studied. Horizontal gene transfer was actually discovered before we had any consensus that DNA was the biological mechanism of heredity, and the experime
14.
by tum92 6y ago
For 1), the average person here might be better equipped to answer than the average biochemist! Sequences are put back together with de bruijn graphs. Small sequences are compiled into continuous segments based on their overlap. The key pie